Long-term benefit of early pre-reperfusion metoprolol administration in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the METOCARD-CNIC trial (Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction)

Gonzalo Pizarro,Leticia Fernández-Friera,Valentin Fuster,Rodrigo Fernández-Jiménez,José M García-Ruiz,Ana García-Álvarez,Alonso Mateos,María V Barreiro,Noemí Escalera,Maite D Rodriguez,Antonio de Miguel,Inés García-Lunar,Juan J Parra-Fuertes,Javier Sánchez-González,Luis Pardillos,Beatriz Nieto,Adriana Jiménez,Raquel Abejón,Teresa Bastante,Vicente Martínez de Vega,José A Cabrera,Beatriz López-Melgar,Gabriela Guzman,Jaime García-Prieto,Jesús G Mirelis,José Luis Zamorano,Agustín Albarrán,Javier Goicolea,Javier Escaned,Stuart Pocock,Andrés Iñiguez,Antonio Fernández-Ortiz,Vicente Sánchez-Brunete,Carlos Macaya,Borja Ibanez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.014
2014-06-10
Abstract:Objectives: The goal of this trial was to study the long-term effects of intravenous (IV) metoprolol administration before reperfusion on left ventricular (LV) function and clinical events. Background: Early IV metoprolol during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been shown to reduce infarct size when used in conjunction with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Methods: The METOCARD-CNIC (Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial recruited 270 patients with Killip class ≤II anterior STEMI presenting early after symptom onset (<6 h) and randomized them to pre-reperfusion IV metoprolol or control group. Long-term magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 202 patients (101 per group) 6 months after STEMI. Patients had a minimal 12-month clinical follow-up. Results: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the 6 months MRI was higher after IV metoprolol (48.7 ± 9.9% vs. 45.0 ± 11.7% in control subjects; adjusted treatment effect 3.49%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44% to 6.55%; p = 0.025). The occurrence of severely depressed LVEF (≤35%) at 6 months was significantly lower in patients treated with IV metoprolol (11% vs. 27%, p = 0.006). The proportion of patients fulfilling Class I indications for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was significantly lower in the IV metoprolol group (7% vs. 20%, p = 0.012). At a median follow-up of 2 years, occurrence of the pre-specified composite of death, heart failure admission, reinfarction, and malignant arrhythmias was 10.8% in the IV metoprolol group versus 18.3% in the control group, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.55; 95% CI: 0.26 to 1.04; p = 0.065. Heart failure admission was significantly lower in the IV metoprolol group (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.015 to 0.95; p = 0.046). Conclusions: In patients with anterior Killip class ≤II STEMI undergoing pPCI, early IV metoprolol before reperfusion resulted in higher long-term LVEF, reduced incidence of severe LV systolic dysfunction and ICD indications, and fewer heart failure admissions. (Effect of METOprolol in CARDioproteCtioN During an Acute Myocardial InfarCtion. The METOCARD-CNIC Trial; NCT01311700).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?