Contemporary trends of leadless pacemaker implantation in the United States
Muhammad Z. Khan,Sameh Nassar,Amanda Nguyen,Muhammad Usman Khan,Yasar Sattar,Waleed Alruwaili,Karthik Gonuguntla,Haitham Mazek,Zain Ul Abideen Asad,Siddharth Agarwal,Sameer Raina,Sudarshan Balla,Bao Nguyen,Dali Fan,Douglas Darden,Muhammad Bilal Munir
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16295
IF: 2.7
2024-05-04
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Abstract:Leadless pacemaker trends in the United States. Introduction Leadless pacemakers (LPM) have established themselves as the important therapeutic modality in management of selected patients with symptomatic bradycardia. To determine real‐world utilization and in‐hospital outcomes of LPM implantation since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 2016. Methods For this retrospective cohort study, data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database from the years 2016−2020. The outcomes analyzed in our study included implantation trends of LPM over study years, mortality, major complications (defined as pericardial effusion requiring intervention, any vascular complication, or acute kidney injury), length of stay, and cost of hospitalization. Implantation trends of LPM were assessed using linear regression. Using years 2016−2017 as a reference, adjusted outcomes of mortality, major complications, prolonged length of stay (defined as >6 days), and increased hospitalization cost (defined as median cost >34 098$) were analyzed for subsequent years using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results There was a gradual increased trend of LPM implantation over our study years (3230 devices in years 2016−2017 to 11 815 devices in year 2020, p for trend
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?