A Grading System for Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma: A Proposal From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee
Andre L Moreira,Paolo S S Ocampo,Yuhe Xia,Hua Zhong,Prudence A Russell,Yuko Minami,Wendy A Cooper,Akihiko Yoshida,Lukas Bubendorf,Mauro Papotti,Giuseppe Pelosi,Fernando Lopez-Rios,Keiko Kunitoki,Dana Ferrari-Light,Lynette M Sholl,Mary Beth Beasley,Alain Borczuk,Johan Botling,Elisabeth Brambilla,Gang Chen,Teh-Ying Chou,Jin-Haeng Chung,Sanja Dacic,Deepali Jain,Fred R Hirsch,David Hwang,Sylvie Lantuejoul,Dongmei Lin,John W Longshore,Noriko Motoi,Masayuki Noguchi,Claudia Poleri,Natasha Rekhtman,Ming-Sound Tsao,Erik Thunnissen,William D Travis,Yasushi Yatabe,Anja C Roden,Jillian B Daigneault,Ignacio I Wistuba,Keith M Kerr,Harvey Pass,Andrew G Nicholson,Mari Mino-Kenudson,Andre L. Moreira,Paolo S.S. Ocampo,Prudence A. Russell,Wendy A. Cooper,Lynette M. Sholl,Fred R. Hirsch,John W. Longshore,William D. Travis,Anja C. Roden,Jillian B. Daigneault,Ignacio I. Wistuba,Keith M. Kerr,Andrew G. Nicholson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2020.06.001
IF: 20.121
2020-10-01
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Abstract:INTRODUCTION: A grading system for pulmonary adenocarcinoma has not been established. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer pathology panel evaluated a set of histologic criteria associated with prognosis aimed at establishing a grading system for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma.METHODS: A multi-institutional study involving multiple cohorts of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas was conducted. A cohort of 284 stage I pulmonary adenocarcinomas was used as a training set to identify histologic features associated with patient outcomes (recurrence-free survival [RFS] and overall survival [OS]). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to select the best model, which was validated (n = 212) and tested (n = 300, including stage I-III) in independent cohorts. Reproducibility of the model was assessed using kappa statistics.RESULTS: The best model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.749 for RFS and 0.787 for OS) was composed of a combination of predominant plus high-grade histologic pattern with a cutoff of 20% for the latter. The model consists of the following: grade 1, lepidic predominant tumor; grade 2, acinar or papillary predominant tumor, both with no or less than 20% of high-grade patterns; and grade 3, any tumor with 20% or more of high-grade patterns (solid, micropapillary, or complex gland). Similar results were seen in the validation (AUC = 0.732 for RFS and 0.787 for OS) and test cohorts (AUC = 0.690 for RFS and 0.743 for OS), confirming the predictive value of the model. Interobserver reproducibility revealed good agreement (k = 0.617).CONCLUSIONS: A grading system based on the predominant and high-grade patterns is practical and prognostic for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma.
oncology,respiratory system