Effect of Increasing Blood Pressure on Brain Tissue Oxygenation in Adults After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Thitikan Kunapaisal,Abhijit V Lele,Courtney Gomez,Anne Moore,Marie Angele Theard,Monica S Vavilala,Abhijit V. Lele,Monica S. Vavilala

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000006211

IF: 8.8

2024-02-01

Critical Care Medicine

Abstract:Objectives: To examine if increasing blood pressure improves brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO 2 ) in adults with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Setting: Level-I trauma center teaching hospital. Patients: Included patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age and with severe (admission Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score < 9) TBI who had advanced neuromonitoring (intracranial blood pressure [ICP], PbtO 2 , and cerebral autoregulation testing). Interventions: The exposure was mean arterial pressure (MAP) augmentation with a vasopressor, and the primary outcome was a PbtO 2 response. Cerebral hypoxia was defined as PbtO 2 less than 20 mm Hg (low). Main Results: MAP challenge test results conducted between ICU admission days 1–3 from 93 patients (median age 31; interquartile range [IQR], 24–44 yr), 69.9% male, White ( n = 69, 74.2%), median head abbreviated injury score 5 (IQR 4–5), and median admission GCS 3 (IQR 3–5) were examined. Across all 93 tests, a MAP increase of 25.7% resulted in a 34.2% cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) increase and 16.3% PbtO 2 increase (no MAP or CPP correlation with PbtO 2 [both R 2 = 0.00]). MAP augmentation increased ICP when cerebral autoregulation was impaired (8.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.06). MAP augmentation resulted in four PbtO 2 responses (normal and maintained [group 1: 58.5%], normal and deteriorated [group 2: 2.2%; average 45.2% PbtO 2 decrease], low and improved [group 3: 12.8%; average 44% PbtO 2 increase], and low and not improved [group 4: 25.8%]). The average end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO 2 ) increase of 5.9% was associated with group 2 when cerebral autoregulation was impaired ( p = 0.02). Conclusions: MAP augmentation after severe TBI resulted in four distinct PbtO 2 response patterns, including PbtO 2 improvement and cerebral hypoxia. Traditionally considered clinical factors were not significant, but cerebral autoregulation status and ICP responses may have moderated MAP and ETCO 2 effects on PbtO 2 response. Further study is needed to examine the role of MAP augmentation as a strategy to improve PbtO 2 in some patients.

critical care medicine