Effects of periodic breathing on sleep at high altitude: a randomized, placebo‐controlled, crossover study using inspiratory CO2

Abubaker Ibrahim,Ambra Stefani,Matteo Cesari,Johanna Roche,Hannes Gatterer,Evi Holzknecht,Rachel Turner,Giovanni Vinetti,Michael Furian,Anna Heidbreder,Birgit Högl,Christoph Siebenmann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jp285397
2024-02-28
The Journal of Physiology
Abstract:figure legend We aimed to (i) develop a method to prevent hypoxia‐induced nocturnal periodic breathing (nPB) via an increased inspiratory CO2 fraction (FiCO2 ) and (ii) use this method to investigate the effects of nPB on sleep architecture at high altitude. Healthy participants susceptible to hypoxia‐induced nPB (confirmed during a screening night) underwent two sojourns in a hypobaric chamber simulating 4000 m altitude, one with increased (CO2 sojourn) and one with normal (placebo sojourn) nocturnal FiCO2 , and with polysomnography during the first and third night. The increased FiCO2 effectively reduced nPB without significantly changing sleep macro‐architecture. Created with BioRender.com. Hypoxia at high altitude facilitates changes in ventilatory control that can lead to nocturnal periodic breathing (nPB). Here, we introduce a placebo‐controlled approach to prevent nPB by increasing inspiratory CO2 and used it to assess whether nPB contributes to the adverse effects of hypoxia on sleep architecture. In a randomized, single‐blinded, crossover design, 12 men underwent two sojourns (three days/nights each, separated by 4 weeks) in hypobaric hypoxia corresponding to 4000 m altitude, with polysomnography during the first and third night of each sojourn. During all nights, subjects' heads were encompassed by a canopy retaining exhaled CO2, and CO2 concentration in the canopy (i.e. inspiratory CO2 concentration) was controlled by adjustment of fresh air inflow. Throughout the placebo sojourn inspiratory CO2 was ≤0.2%, whereas throughout the other sojourn it was increased to 1.76% (IQR, 1.07%–2.44%). During the placebo sojourn, total sleep time (TST) with nPB was 54.3% (37.4%–80.8%) and 45.0% (24.5%–56.5%) during the first and the third night, respectively (P = 0.042). Increased inspiratory CO2 reduced TST with nPB by an absolute 38.1% (28.1%–48.1%), the apnoea–hypopnoea index by 58.1/h (40.1–76.1/h), and oxygen desaturation index ≥3% by 56.0/h (38.9.1–73.2/h) (all P
neurosciences,physiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?