Abstract:Abstract The aim of the present study was to investigate the serving techniques in male top level volleyball, especially the tactical and spatial behavior of the servers and receiving opponents focusing on the pros and cons of the different serving techniques. An analysis was made of 4552 serves from 28 matches played during the 2008-2009 regular season of the Italian volleyball male Top League. Serving techniques were categorized into Jump Serve (JS), Float Jump Serve (FJS) and Float Serve (FS), and for each serve several parameters were recorded: role of the server (Setter - S, Hitter - H, and Middle Blocker - MB), kind of serve (JS, FJS, FS), number of players defending the serve (Defense), difficulty in receiving the serve (RS), evaluation of serve outcome (EV), and defensive court zone where the ball was directed (FZ). The results confirmed the largest use of the JS (69.9%), followed by the FJS (26.9%) and the FS (3.3%). There were significant relationships between the serve technique, the EV, the Defense and the FZ where the serves were directed (Chi-Square p = 0.000). The zone absolutely most hit was the posterior/central, followed by the left/posteriors. There were significant differences in the RS difficulty for the JS respect to FJS ( p = 0.001) and FS ( p = 0.000) and also for the defensive strategies performed: a defense strategy with 2 defenders showed significant and better score during the reception respect to that with 3 ( p = 0.000). No statistical relationship was found between the role of the server and other parameters. These results are consistent with previous studies in which JS showed to be the most powerful technique in terms of increasing defensive difficulties but, at the same time, with a fairly high percentage of errors. This issue must be taken into consideration in crucial phases of the game, and the serving techniques must be used strategically. JS can be very useful for increasing the defensive “conflict zones” with the aim to score a direct ace or to make the offensive maneuver difficult after reception. FJS can be useful when there is the need to aim a specific FZ and prepare the team for the next defense action. Scouting or match analysis procedure of the serving statistics should be performed during the game to better indicate the serve strategy to choose.

Analysis of male volleyball players' motor activities during a top level match

Biomechanical Assessment of Strength and Jumping Ability in Male Volleyball Players During the Annual Training Macrocycle

Strength Abilities and Serve Reception Efficiency of Youth Female Volleyball Players

Jumping Flying Distance and Jump Performance of Elite Male Volleyball Players at FIVB Volleyball Men’s World Championship

Relationships Between Anaerobic Performance, Field Tests and Game Performance of Sitting Volleyball Players

Anaerobic Capacity Level Differences of Each Player Position in Volleyball

A Comprehensive Analysis of the Serve Reception Zone, Set Zone and Attack Quality of the Top-Level Volleyball Players

Spatio-temporal Analysis Of Volleyball Serve

Influence of jump height on the game efficiency in elite volleyball players

Analysis of game variables to predict scoring and performance levels in elite men’s volleyball

Differences in external load among indoor and beach volleyball players during elite matches

Evaluation of Game Performance in Elite Male Sitting Volleyball Players

Attack and Serve Performances According to the Match Period and Quality of Opposition in Elite Volleyball Matches

Notational Analysis of the Volleyball Serve

Time-motion Characteristics of Match-Play in Elite Polish Youth Soccer Players of Various Playing Positions

Fatigue-Induced Neuromuscular Performance Changes in Professional Male Volleyball Players

Differences in Game Dynamics between High-Level Volleyball and Beach Volleyball Matches

An Analysis of Playing Positions in Elite Men's Volleyball: Considerations for Competition Demands and Physiologic Characteristics

Volleyball Data Analysis System and Method Based on Machine Learning.

Game-Related Performance Factors in four European Men's Professional Volleyball Championships

Anthropometric, Physical, and Age Differences by the Player Position and the Performance Level in Volleyball