General practice training environment and its impact on preparedness

Sharon Wiener-Ogilvie,Jenny Bennison,Victor Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2014.11494236

Abstract:Introduction: The notion of preparedness for practice is poorly defined in medical education literature. It is unclear what preparedness means and how the training environment impacts on preparedness for practice. Objectives: This paper aims to explore the meaning that GP trainees and newly qualified GPs attach to the notion of preparedness, and to examine the ways in which they perceive their training environment to impact on preparedness. Methods: We used a qualitative interpretive approach and conducted 27 in-depth semi-structured interviews with 15 newly qualified GPs and 12 GP trainees at the end of their training. Results: Two central categories describing preparedness emerged; 'confidence' and 'adaptability'. Inclusive training practices, characterised by non-hierarchical relationships between the doctors, particularly vis-à-vis trainees, were reported to be more 'progressive' and were better at preparing trainees. The way the training practice can impact on preparedness can be explained drawing on Lave and Wenger's theory of 'situated learning'. The role of the trainer was also pivotal in preparing trainees. Supervision tailored to trainees' needs, and guided decision making enhanced confidence of trainees in their ability to work independently in the future. Conclusions: We suggest that for GP trainees to be better prepared it is not enough to extend GP training; rather it is important that GP trainees' time is spent in inclusive training environments.