Improving the Active AirCore System to Determine the Destruction Rate Efficiency of Gas Flares in the Netherlands
Noni van Ettinger,Steven van Heuven,Huilin Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-15206
2024-01-01
Abstract:Avoiding unnecessary methane (CH4) emissions is an easy way to mitigate the effects ofclimate change, since methane has a higher global warming potential and a shorter lifetimecompared to carbon dioxide (CO2) and often no purpose is served with the flaring. Flaring isthe disposal of associated gas by combustion. In some cases, the flaring is unavoidable toensure the safety of the personnel, while in other instances flaring can easily be avoided,resulting in unnecessary emissions. Yearly, approximately 140 billion cubic meters is flaredglobally. With a destruction rate efficiency (DRE) of 98%, this results in yearly GHGs emissionof 315 Mt of CO2 and 1.4 Mt of CH4 (or 315 Mt and 42 Mt of CO2 equivalent). It is speculatedthat the DRE of flares in operation is generally lower. For example, Plant et al. 2022 found aDRE of 91% across three oil basins in the United States using an aircraft-based study.However, there is still a lack of experimental data from other countries and on facility-scale.In this research, the active AirCore system described by Andersen et al. 2018 was improvedand used to determine the flaring efficiency from gas flares in the Netherlands. An in-situCO2 sensor was added to obtain an in-flight signal allowing to reliably sample the entirecross section of the plume. To test the system, it was used during two separate campaignsin the Netherlands. The flaring (by a Dutch national gas grid operator) is a routine part ofscheduled infrastructure maintenance. The operator’s mobile flaring unit has beenspecifically designed for high-efficiency combustion. In the flare plume, we observed a DREof 99.7% ± 0.2%. However, the last 1.2 bar absolute (of 40) that remains in the gas pipes isvented and decreases the methane emission mitigation efficacy (MEME) of the operator’sprocedure with 3%. Additionally, using the in-situ sensor we were able to determine the CO2fluxes from flaring during the campaigns which equated to a CH4 burn rate of 1240 ± 300m3/h over three different flights, which agrees with the nominal burn rate of 1200 m3/h. Thisshows that the system can characterize flaring efficiency and emissions well, which providesus the capability to use the system in future flaring campaigns where the gas flushing rate isstill unknown. ReferencesAndersen, T., Scheeren, B., Peters, W., Chen, H. (2018). A UAV-based active Aircore system formeasurements of greenhouse gases. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2683-2699,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2683-2018Plant, G., Kort, E. A., Brandt, A. R., Chen, Y., Fordice, G., Gorchov Negron, A. M., Schwietzke, S.,Smith, M., & Zavala-Araiza, D. (2022). Inefficient and unlit natural gas flares both emit largequantities of methane. Science, 377(6614), 1566–1571. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq0385