Reperfusion of liver graft during transplantation: techniques used in transplant centres within Eurotransplant and meta-analysis of the literature.
Giulia Manzini,Michael Kremer,Philipp Houben,Matthias Gondan,Wolf O Bechstein,Thomas Becker,Gabriela A Berlakovich,Helmut Friess,Markus Guba,Werner Hohenberger,Jan N M Ijzermans,Sven Jonas,Jörg C Kalff,Ernst Klar,Jürgen Klempnauer,Jan Lerut,Hans Lippert,Thomas Lorf,Silvio Nadalin,Björn Nashan,Gerd Otto,Andreas Paul,Jacques Pirenne,Johann Pratschke,Jan Ringers,Xavier Rogiers,Martin K Schilling,Daniel Seehofer,Norbert Senninger,Utz Settmacher,Dirk L Stippel,Karlheinz Tscheliessnigg,Dirk Ysebaert,Heidrun Binder,Peter Schemmer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.12083
2013-01-01
Transplant International
Abstract:It remains unclear which liver graft reperfusion technique leads to the best outcome following transplantation. An online survey was sent to all transplant centres (n=37) within Eurotransplant (ET) to collect information on their technique used for reperfusion of liver grafts. Furthermore, a systematic review of all literature was performed and a meta-analysis was conducted based on patients' mortality, number of retransplantations and incidence of biliary complications, depending on the technique used. Of the 28 evaluated centres, 11 (39%) reported performing simultaneous reperfusion (SIMR), 13 (46%) perform initial portal vein reperfusion (IPR), 1 (4%) performs an initial hepatic artery reperfusion (IAR) and 3 (11%) perform retrograde reperfusion (RETR). In 21 centres (75%), one reperfusion technique is used as a standard, but in only one centre is this decision based on available literature. Twenty centres (71%) said they would agree to participate in randomized controlled trials (RCT) if required. For meta-analysis, IAR vs. IPR, SIMR vs. IPR and RETR vs. IPR were compared. There was no difference between any of the techniques compared. There is no consensus on a preferable reperfusion technique. Available evidence does not help in the decision-making process. There is thus an urgent need for multicentric RCTs.