Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture for depression. Methods: Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang, SinoMed and VIP Database for RCTs of acupuncture in treatment of depression. The search time was from the establishment of database to December 1, 2023, and the language restriction was Chinese and English. The reporting quality of RCTs of acupuncture for depression was evaluated using the CONSORT statement, the international standardization for trial reporting, STRICTA, the international standard for clinical trial interventions of acupuncture, and SHARE, the guideline and checklist for reporting sham acupuncture controls. Results: According to the CONSORT statement items, the items with the reporting rate less than 50% was accounted for 54.05% of all of the items for Chinese articles, and there were 8 and 1 items with a reporting rate of 0% and 100%, respectively. For the English articles, the items with the reporting rate less than 50% was accounted for 35.14% of all of the items, and there were 3 and 7 items with a reporting rate of 0% and 100%, respectively. The reporting rate of 15 items in Chinese and English articles was greater than 50%, e.g. structured abstract, background and purpose. Based on STRICTA criteria, the reporting rate of either Chinese or English articles was relatively high. The items for Chinese articles with the reporting rate less than 50% was accounted for 23.53% of all of the items, and there were 1 and 4 items with a reporting rate of 0% and 100%, respectively. For English articles, the items with the reporting rate less than 50% was accounted for 11.76% of all of the items, and there was 1 item with a reporting rate of either 0% or 100%. In compliance with SHARE checklist, the reporting rate was low for either Chinese or English articles. The items with the reporting rate less than 50% was accounted for 57.89% of all of the items for Chinese articles, and there were 2 and 0 items with a reporting rate of 0% and 100%, respectively. For English articles, the items with the reporting rate less than 50% was accounted for 52.63% of all of the items, and there was 1 item with a reporting rate of 0% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: The overall reporting quality of RCTs of acupuncture for depression is low currently. It is urgent to enhance the reporting of the details on sham acupuncture control especially. It is suggested that RCTs should be reported strictly in compliance with the CONSORT statement, STRICTA criteria, and SHARE checklist in the future.

[Quality improvement on acupuncture intervention report: application and perfection of STRICTA]

Revised Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT statement

Do the CONSORT and STRICTA Checklists Improve the Reporting Quality of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Chinese Journals? A Systematic Review and Analysis of Trends

Overall Reporting Descriptions of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain in Randomized Controlled Trials in English Journals

Assessment of reporting completeness in acupuncture studies on patients with functional constipation using the STRICTA guidelines

Factors Influencing the Quality of Acupuncture Clinical Trials: a Qualitative Interview of Stakeholders.

Proposed reporting of Tai Chi intervention in clinical trials

Suboptimal reporting of randomized controlled trials on non-pharmacological therapies in Chinese medicine

Qualities of Controlled Clinical Trials Relevant to Acupuncture and Moxibustion Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease in Literatures Published in China from 1990——2009

Registration Quality Assessment Of Acupuncture Clinical Trials

Overall Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Reporting quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture.

Strengthening the quality of clinical trials of acupuncture: a guideline protocol

The Quality Of Reporting In Randomized Controlled Trials Of Acupuncture For Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Survey

STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Tuina/Massage (STRICTOTM): Extending the CONSORT Statement

[Evaluation of the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for depression based on CONSORT statement, STRICTA criteria and SHARE checklist]

Reporting characteristics and quality of randomized controlled trial protocols in traditional Chinese medicine: a cross-sectional study

Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials of angina pectoris with integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine interventions: a cross-sectional study

Reporting quality of meta-analyses in acupuncture: Investigating adherence to the PRISMA statement

Assessment of Quality of Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials of Moxibustion for Chronic Diseases Using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Moxibustion Statements