COST‐EFFECTIVENESS RELATIONSHIPS IN ODOR CONTROL

R. C. Haring,A. Turk,R. Okey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb49868.x

IF: 6.499

1974-09-01

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract:The general techniques of odor control have been reviewed extensively.' Briefly summarized, these methods are: 1) dispersal to dilute the odorants below a detectable or offensive level; 2) conversion of the odorants to odorless products, preferably by oxidation to CO, and H,O; 3) condensation to a liquid phase by scrubbing or to a solid phase by adsorption; 4) modification of their sensory impact by admixture with other odorants to mask or attenuate their unpleasantness; and 5 ) alteration of the process responsible for the production of the odorous matter. The complexities involved in the applications of these methods may be best appreciated with the aid of a brief description of their applications to specific industries. It will become apparent in the discussions that, for any particular industry, some combination of control methods is usually required. This stems from two major factors: 1) most industrial odorants contain many components, and may therefore not be amenable to a single treatment: and 2) many odorants occur in relatively low concentration; frequently, the best way to handle this is to c o n centrate them by one system, and then process them for recovery or destruction by a second type of equipment.