Abstract:Social media datasets make it possible to rapidly quantify collective attention to emerging topics and breaking news, such as crisis events. Collective attention is typically measured by aggregate counts, such as the number of posts that mention a name or hashtag. But according to rationalist models of natural language communication, the collective salience of each entity will be expressed not only in how often it is mentioned, but in the form that those mentions take. This is because natural language communication is premised on (and customized to) the expectations that speakers and writers have about how their messages will be interpreted by the intended audience. We test this idea by conducting a large-scale analysis of public online discussions of breaking news events on Facebook and Twitter, focusing on five recent crisis events. We examine how people refer to locations, focusing specifically on contextual descriptors, such as "San Juan" versus "San Juan, Puerto Rico." Rationalist accounts of natural language communication predict that such descriptors will be unnecessary (and therefore omitted) when the named entity is expected to have high prior salience to the reader. We find that the use of contextual descriptors is indeed associated with proxies for social and informational expectations, including macro-level factors like the location's global salience and micro-level factors like audience engagement. We also find a consistent decrease in descriptor context use over the lifespan of each crisis event. These findings provide evidence about how social media users communicate with their audiences, and point towards more fine-grained models of collective attention that may help researchers and crisis response organizations to better understand public perception of unfolding crisis events.

Convergence Behaviour of Bystanders: An Analysis of 2016 Munich Shooting Twitter Crisis Communication

An Analysis of the Psychological and Social Factors behind Bystanders' Complete Inaction during the Tangshan Restaurant Attack

Threat or Opportunity? - Examining Social Bots in Social Media Crisis Communication

Understanding the Bystander Effect on Toxic Twitter Conversations

Who shapes crisis communication on Twitter? An analysis of influential German-language accounts during the COVID-19 pandemic

Bystanders Join in Cyberbullying on Social Networking Sites: The Deindividuation and Moral Disengagement Perspectives

Characterizing Collective Attention via Descriptor Context: A Case Study of Public Discussions of Crisis Events

Bystanding or standing by? How the number of bystanders affects the intention to intervene in cyberbullying

Social media use of the police in crisis situations: A mixed-method study on communication practices of the German police

Madness of the crowd: Understanding mass behaviors through a multidisciplinary lens

Taking the lead in misinformation-related conversations in social media networks during a mass shooting crisis

Detecting coordinated and bot-like behavior in Twitter: the Jürgen Conings case

Too civil to care? How online hate speech against different social groups affects bystander intervention

Bystanders’ Responses to Witnessing Cyberbullying: the Role of Empathic Distress, Empathic Anger, and Compassion

Understanding Bystanders' Willingness to Intervene in Traditional and Cyberbullying Scenarios

The Potential of Social Media Analytics for Improving Social Media Communication of Emergency Agencies

Collective response of human populations to large-scale emergencies

Reactive and Asymmetric Communication Flows: Social Media Discourse and Partisan News Framing in the Wake of Mass Shootings

Workplace cyberbullying and bystander helping behaviour

Bystander behavior in cyberbullying

I’ll be there for you? The bystander intervention model and cyber aggression