Safety, Efficacy, and Biomarker Analysis of Toripalimab in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from a Multicenter Phase II Trial POLARIS-03

Xinan Sheng,Haige Chen,Bin Hu,Xudong Yao,Ziling Liu,Xin Yao,Hongqian Guo,Yi Hu,Zhigang Ji,Hong Luo,Benkang Shi,Jiyan Liu,Jin Wu,FangJian Zhou,Zhisong He,Jinhai Fan,Weifeng Wang,Hui Feng,Sheng Yao,Patricia Keegan,Yiran Huang,Jun Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-2210
IF: 13.801
2021-11-05
Clinical Cancer Research
Abstract:PURPOSE: Immunotherapy offers a second-line option for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who failed standard therapy, but the biomarkers for predicting response remain to be explored. This study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and correlative biomarker of toripalimab in patients with previously treated mUC.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mUC received toripalimab 3 mg/kg Q2W. Clinical response was assessed every 8 weeks by an independent review committee per RECIST v1.1. Tumor PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and other biomarkers were evaluated.RESULTS: Among the intention-to-treat population (<i>n</i> = 151), 85% of the patients experienced treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) and 20% experienced grade 3 and above TRAE. The objective response rate (ORR) was 26% with a disease control rate (DCR) of 45%. The median duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 19.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.9-not estimable], 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.8-3.6), and 14.4 months (95% CI, 9.3-23.1), respectively. Both PD-L1<sup>+</sup> and TMB-high (10 mutations/Mb as the cutoff) patients had better ORR than PD-L1<sup>-</sup> patients (42% vs. 17%, <i>P</i> = 0.002) and TMB-low patients (48% vs. 22%, <i>P</i> = 0.014), respectively. The TMB-high group also showed better PFS (12.9 vs. 1.8 months, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and OS (not reached versus 10.0 months, <i>P</i> = 0.018) than the TMB-low group.CONCLUSIONS: Toripalimab has demonstrated encouraging clinical activity in the second-line treatment of mUC with a manageable safety profile. PD-L1 expression and TMB were two independent biomarkers in the study.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?