Effects of different acidifiers on the conversion and loss of nitrogen from pig slurry during long-term storage

Guang-yin Chen,Jin-zhu Dong,Pei Wu,Geng Yang,Jing Meng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2024.103539
IF: 7.758
2024-01-26
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Abstract:Animal manure is widely used in farmland, and the acidification of animal slurry has been proven to be an effective method to reduce nitrogen (N) loss during storage. Although there is evidence that H 2 SO 4 is a good acidifier of animal slurry, it is strictly controlled by the Chinese government. Hence, an alternative is required. The one-time acidification of pig slurry with hydrochloric acid (HCl), sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ), nitric acid (HNO 3 ), phosphoric acid (H 3 PO 4 ), formic acid (CH 2 O 2 ), and acetic acid (C 2 H 4 O 2 ) to pH 5.0 with a storage period of 180 days is investigated in this study. The results demonstrated that a large amount of nitrogen (79.8%) in the pig slurry was lost during 180 days of storage and the value is related to untreated slurry. Acidification with all of the mentioned acidifiers reduced the N loss. The lowest N loss was obtained using H 3 PO 4 (11.9%), the second lowest was H 2 SO 4 (31.7%), the third lowest was HCl (40.6%), and HNO 3 had the worst results (76.0%). After acidification, the microbial community number in the pig slurry declined by more than 10%, and more than a half of the microbial community changed. The relative abundance of Pseudomonadaceae in the pig slurry acidified with formic acid was 15.9%, which was much higher than that acidified with H 3 PO 4 (0.9%), leading to a more rapid nitrogen conversion rate and a higher N loss. Therefore, it is technically feasible to use H 3 PO 4 as an alternative to H 2 SO 4 for a reduction in N loss during pig slurry storage.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental,biotechnology & applied microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?