Abstract:Quantitative label-free mass spectrometry (MS) is an increasingly powerful technology for profiling thousands of proteins from complex biological samples. One of the primary goals of analyses performed on such proteomics data is to detect differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) under different experimental conditions. Many statistical methods have been developed and assessed for DEP detection in various proteomics studies. However, it remains a challenge for many proteomics scientists to choose an appropriate statistical procedure. Therefore, in this study, we organized 12 common testing algorithms and 6 P-value combination methods and further provided Cohen's d effect size for every protein and three evaluation criteria to help proteomics scientists investigate their influence on DEP detection in a systematic manner. To promote the widespread use of these methods, we developed a user-friendly web tool, StatsPro, and presented two case studies involving label-free quantitative proteomics data obtained using data-dependent acquisition and data-independent acquisition to illustrate its practicability. This tool is freely available in our GitHub repository (https://github.com/YanglabWCH/StatsPro/). SIGNIFICANCE: One of the primary goals of analyses performed on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based proteomics data is to detect differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) under different experimental conditions. Despite of many research efforts have been proposed to detect DEPs, to date, there is a scarcity of efficient, systematic, and easy-to-handle tools that are tailored for proteomics scientists to choose an appropriate statistical procedure. Herein, we present a new tool, StatsPro, to enable implementation and evaluation of different statistical methods for proteomics scientists. This tool has two significant advances compared to existing software: a) It integrates up to 18 common statistical approaches (12 statistical tests and 6 P-value combination strategies) and performs Cohen's d effect size systematically for users, moreover, it provides a web-based interface and can be quite conveniently operated by users, even those with less profound computational background. b) It supports three performance evaluation criteria (e.g. number of DEPs, correlation coefficient between P-values and effect sizes, Area under the ROC curve) for users to review the final statistical results, which may guide the method selection for DEPs detection.

Global quantitative proteomics using spectral counting: an inexpensive experimental and bioinformatics workflow for deep proteome coverage

WaveletQuant, an Improved Quantification Software Based on Wavelet Signal Threshold De-Noising for Labeled Quantitative Proteomic Analysis

Comparative evaluation of label-free quantification strategies.

A Novel Spectral Library Workflow to Enhance Protein Identifications

Computational Analysis and Comparison of Continuous and Count-based Label-free Quantitative Proteomic Data

Chemical Probes and Tandem Mass Spectrometry: a Strategy for the Quantitative Analysis of Proteomes and Subproteomes.

A Fast Workflow for Identification and Quantification of Proteomes

Evaluation of Spectral Counting for Relative Quantitation of Proteoforms in Top-Down Proteomics

Fast Proteome Identification and Quantification from Data-Dependent Acquisition - Tandem Mass Spectrometry using Free Software Tools

An integrated workflow for quantitative analysis of the newly synthesized proteome

Mass Spectrometry-Based Quantitative Proteomic Profiling

A rapid methods development workflow for high-throughput quantitative proteomic applications

freeQuant: A Mass Spectrometry Label-Free Quantification Software Tool for Complex Proteome Analysis.

Quantitative proteomics: assessing the spectrum of in-gel protein detection methods

Label--free Protein Quantification Methods in Proteomics Research

IQuant: an Automated Pipeline for Quantitative Proteomics Based Upon Isobaric Tags

Label-Free Protein Quantification Using Lc-Coupled Ion Trap or Ft Mass Spectrometry: Reproducibility, Linearity, and Application with Complex Proteomes

Relative And Absolute Quantitation In Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics

StatsPro: Systematic Integration and Evaluation of Statistical Approaches for Detecting Differential Expression in Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics.

Genome-scale Proteome Quantification by DEEP SEQ Mass Spectrometry

Refinements of LC-MS/MS Spectral Counting Statistics Improve Quantification of Low Abundance Proteins