Abstract:Artificial Intelligence (AI) has achieved remarkable success in image generation, image analysis, and language modeling, making data-driven techniques increasingly relevant in practical real-world applications, promising enhanced creativity and efficiency for human users. However, the deployment of AI in high-stakes domains such as infrastructure and healthcare still raises concerns regarding algorithm accountability and safety. The emerging field of explainable AI (XAI) has made significant strides in developing interfaces that enable humans to comprehend the decisions made by data-driven models. Among these approaches, concept-based explainability stands out due to its ability to align explanations with high-level concepts familiar to users. Nonetheless, early research in adversarial machine learning has unveiled that exposing model explanations can render victim models more susceptible to attacks. This is the first study to investigate and compare the impact of concept-based explanations on the privacy of Deep Learning based AI models in the context of biomedical image analysis. An extensive privacy benchmark is conducted on three different state-of-the-art model architectures (ResNet50, NFNet, ConvNeXt) trained on two biomedical (ISIC and EyePACS) and one synthetic dataset (SCDB). The success of membership inference attacks while exposing varying degrees of attribution-based and concept-based explanations is systematically compared. The findings indicate that, in theory, concept-based explanations can potentially increase the vulnerability of a private AI system by up to 16% compared to attributions in the baseline setting. However, it is demonstrated that, in more realistic attack scenarios, the threat posed by explanations is negligible in practice. Furthermore, actionable recommendations are provided to ensure the safe deployment of concept-based XAI systems. In addition, the impact of differential privacy (DP) on the quality of concept-based explanations is explored, revealing that while negatively influencing the explanation ability, DP can have an adverse effect on the models' privacy.

A Tale of Two Imperatives: Privacy and Explainability

Privacy Meets Explainability: A Comprehensive Impact Benchmark

The privacy-explainability trade-off: unraveling the impacts of differential privacy and federated learning on attribution methods

Privacy Implications of Explainable AI in Data-Driven Systems

Privacy-Preserving Case-Based Explanations: Enabling Visual Interpretability by Protecting Privacy

Preserving the Privacy of Reward Functions in MDPs through Deception

Model Explanations with Differential Privacy

Privacy-Preserving Algorithmic Recourse

Use Privacy in Data-Driven Systems: Theory and Experiments with Machine Learnt Programs

Privacy Profiles for Private Selection

Privacy accounting $\varepsilon$conomics: Improving differential privacy composition via a posteriori bounds

Translating theory into practice: assessing the privacy implications of concept-based explanations for biomedical AI

Not one but many Tradeoffs: Privacy Vs. Utility in Differentially Private Machine Learning

Privacy at a Price: Exploring its Dual Impact on AI Fairness

Evaluating Differentially Private Machine Learning in Practice

Explaining the Model, Protecting Your Data: Revealing and Mitigating the Data Privacy Risks of Post-Hoc Model Explanations via Membership Inference

Rethinking Privacy in Machine Learning Pipelines from an Information Flow Control Perspective

Provable Privacy with Non-Private Pre-Processing

Accurate, Explainable, and Private Models: Providing Recourse While Minimizing Training Data Leakage

Thinking Outside of the Differential Privacy Box: A Case Study in Text Privatization with Language Model Prompting

Scalable Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Real-Time Machine Learning Applications