Abstract:Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) with gradient clipping is a powerful technique for enabling differentially private optimization. Although prior works extensively investigated clipping with a constant threshold, private training remains highly sensitive to threshold selection, which can be expensive or even infeasible to tune. This sensitivity motivates the development of adaptive approaches, such as quantile clipping, which have demonstrated empirical success but lack a solid theoretical understanding. This paper provides the first comprehensive convergence analysis of SGD with quantile clipping (QC-SGD). We demonstrate that QC-SGD suffers from a bias problem similar to constant-threshold clipped SGD but show how this can be mitigated through a carefully designed quantile and step size schedule. Our analysis reveals crucial relationships between quantile selection, step size, and convergence behavior, providing practical guidelines for parameter selection. We extend these results to differentially private optimization, establishing the first theoretical guarantees for DP-QC-SGD. Our findings provide theoretical foundations for widely used adaptive clipping heuristic and highlight open avenues for future research.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **the convergence problem of Quantile Clipping in Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), especially its application in differentially private optimization**. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following points: 1. **Limitations of fixed - threshold clipping**: - Traditional SGD achieves differentially private optimization by setting a fixed clipping threshold. However, the choice of this fixed threshold is very sensitive and difficult to optimize. This not only increases the difficulty of parameter tuning but also may lead to poor performance. - The fixed - threshold clipping method has limitations in practical applications. Especially when there are large differences between different tasks and datasets, a unified clipping strategy may not be the optimal choice. 2. **Advantages and theoretical gaps of adaptive clipping**: - Adaptive clipping methods (such as quantile - based clipping) have shown good performance in practice. They can dynamically adjust the clipping threshold according to the changes in the gradient distribution, thereby improving the robustness and efficiency of the model. - However, the theoretical analysis of adaptive clipping methods is relatively insufficient, lacking strict proofs and support for convergence. 3. **Bias problem of quantile clipping**: - The paper points out that quantile clipping (QC - SGD) also has a bias problem, similar to fixed - threshold clipping SGD. This bias will hinder the convergence of the algorithm. - To overcome this problem, the paper proposes a carefully designed quantile and step - size scheduling scheme to effectively eliminate the bias and ensure convergence. 4. **Differentially private extension**: - The paper further extends the quantile clipping method to differentially private optimization (DP - QC - SGD), providing the first theoretical guarantee for differentially private quantile - clipping SGD. - This extension is of great significance for protecting privacy while maintaining model performance. In summary, this paper aims to fill the research gap in the convergence of adaptive clipping methods through strict theoretical analysis and provide new solutions for differentially private optimization.

On the Convergence of DP-SGD with Adaptive Clipping

Differentially Private SGD Without Clipping Bias: An Error-Feedback Approach

Characterizing Private Clipped Gradient Descent on Convex Generalized Linear Problems.

Improving Differentially Private SGD via Randomly Sparsified Gradients

DP-SGD with weight clipping

Dynamic Differential-Privacy Preserving SGD

PCDP-SGD: Improving the Convergence of Differentially Private SGD via Projection in Advance

Enhancing DP-SGD through Non-monotonous Adaptive Scaling Gradient Weight

Normalized/Clipped SGD with Perturbation for Differentially Private Non-Convex Optimization

To Clip or not to Clip: the Dynamics of SGD with Gradient Clipping in High-Dimensions

Revisiting Gradient Clipping: Stochastic bias and tight convergence guarantees

A(DP)$^2$SGD: Asynchronous Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descent with Differential Privacy

Clip Body and Tail Separately: High Probability Guarantees for DPSGD with Heavy Tails

A(DP)$^2$2SGD: Asynchronous Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descent with Differential Privacy

Clipped SGD Algorithms for Privacy Preserving Performative Prediction: Bias Amplification and Remedies

From Gradient Clipping to Normalization for Heavy Tailed SGD

Clip21: Error Feedback for Gradient Clipping

Robust Stochastic Optimization via Gradient Quantile Clipping

Beyond Uniform Lipschitz Condition in Differentially Private Optimization

High Probability Analysis for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimization with Clipping

Differentially Private Learning with Per-Sample Adaptive Clipping.