Abstract:Because "out-of-the-box" large language models are capable of generating a great deal of objectionable content, recent work has focused on aligning these models in an attempt to prevent undesirable generation. While there has been some success at circumventing these measures -- so-called "jailbreaks" against LLMs -- these attacks have required significant human ingenuity and are brittle in practice. In this paper, we propose a simple and effective attack method that causes aligned language models to generate objectionable behaviors. Specifically, our approach finds a suffix that, when attached to a wide range of queries for an LLM to produce objectionable content, aims to maximize the probability that the model produces an affirmative response (rather than refusing to answer). However, instead of relying on manual engineering, our approach automatically produces these adversarial suffixes by a combination of greedy and gradient-based search techniques, and also improves over past automatic prompt generation methods. Surprisingly, we find that the adversarial prompts generated by our approach are quite transferable, including to black-box, publicly released LLMs. Specifically, we train an adversarial attack suffix on multiple prompts (i.e., queries asking for many different types of objectionable content), as well as multiple models (in our case, Vicuna-7B and 13B). When doing so, the resulting attack suffix is able to induce objectionable content in the public interfaces to ChatGPT, Bard, and Claude, as well as open source LLMs such as LLaMA-2-Chat, Pythia, Falcon, and others. In total, this work significantly advances the state-of-the-art in adversarial attacks against aligned language models, raising important questions about how such systems can be prevented from producing objectionable information. Code is available at <a class="link-external link-http" href="http://github.com/llm-attacks/llm-attacks" rel="external noopener nofollow">this http URL</a>.

An Engorgio Prompt Makes Large Language Model Babble on

On Large Language Models’ Resilience to Coercive Interrogation

An LLM can Fool Itself: A Prompt-Based Adversarial Attack

Attack Prompt Generation for Red Teaming and Defending Large Language Models

Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models

Cognitive Overload Attack:Prompt Injection for Long Context

AdvPrompter: Fast Adaptive Adversarial Prompting for LLMs

Can a large language model be a gaslighter?

Talking Nonsense: Probing Large Language Models' Understanding of Adversarial Gibberish Inputs

Automatic and Universal Prompt Injection Attacks against Large Language Models

DROJ: A Prompt-Driven Attack against Large Language Models

Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing

Denial-of-Service Poisoning Attacks against Large Language Models

Probing the Safety Response Boundary of Large Language Models via Unsafe Decoding Path Generation

RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired Content

On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models

Catastrophic Jailbreak of Open-source LLMs via Exploiting Generation

ObscurePrompt: Jailbreaking Large Language Models via Obscure Input

TrojLLM: A Black-box Trojan Prompt Attack on Large Language Models

Prefix Guidance: A Steering Wheel for Large Language Models to Defend Against Jailbreak Attacks

Inducing High Energy-Latency of Large Vision-Language Models with Verbose Images