Abstract:The ML community is rapidly exploring techniques for prompting language models (LMs) and for stacking them into pipelines that solve complex tasks. Unfortunately, existing LM pipelines are typically implemented using hard-coded "prompt templates", i.e. lengthy strings discovered via trial and error. Toward a more systematic approach for developing and optimizing LM pipelines, we introduce DSPy, a programming model that abstracts LM pipelines as text transformation graphs, i.e. imperative computational graphs where LMs are invoked through declarative modules. DSPy modules are parameterized, meaning they can learn (by creating and collecting demonstrations) how to apply compositions of prompting, finetuning, augmentation, and reasoning techniques. We design a compiler that will optimize any DSPy pipeline to maximize a given metric. We conduct two case studies, showing that succinct DSPy programs can express and optimize sophisticated LM pipelines that reason about math word problems, tackle multi-hop retrieval, answer complex questions, and control agent loops. Within minutes of compiling, a few lines of DSPy allow GPT-3.5 and llama2-13b-chat to self-bootstrap pipelines that outperform standard few-shot prompting (generally by over 25% and 65%, respectively) and pipelines with expert-created demonstrations (by up to 5-46% and 16-40%, respectively). On top of that, DSPy programs compiled to open and relatively small LMs like 770M-parameter T5 and llama2-13b-chat are competitive with approaches that rely on expert-written prompt chains for proprietary GPT-3.5. DSPy is available at <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/stanfordnlp/dspy" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>

A Comparative Study of DSPy Teleprompter Algorithms for Aligning Large Language Models Evaluation Metrics to Human Evaluation

Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programs

DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines

CoPrompter: User-Centric Evaluation of LLM Instruction Alignment for Improved Prompt Engineering

Supervisory Prompt Training

Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Search

DecoPrompt : Decoding Prompts Reduces Hallucinations when Large Language Models Meet False Premises

PRompt Optimization in Multi-Step Tasks (PROMST): Integrating Human Feedback and Heuristic-based Sampling

Black-Box Prompt Optimization: Aligning Large Language Models without Model Training

Fine-Tuning and Prompt Optimization: Two Great Steps that Work Better Together

PACE: Improving Prompt with Actor-Critic Editing for Large Language Model

PromptAid: Prompt Exploration, Perturbation, Testing and Iteration using Visual Analytics for Large Language Models

Toward Large Language Models as a Therapeutic Tool: Comparing Prompting Techniques to Improve GPT-Delivered Problem-Solving Therapy

Which Prompts Make The Difference? Data Prioritization For Efficient Human LLM Evaluation

Show, Don't Tell: Aligning Language Models with Demonstrated Feedback

Prompt Space Optimizing Few-shot Reasoning Success with Large Language Models

Are Large Language Models Good Prompt Optimizers?

iPrOp: Interactive Prompt Optimization for Large Language Models with a Human in the Loop

AlignedCoT: Prompting Large Language Models via Native-Speaking Demonstrations

PromptOptMe: Error-Aware Prompt Compression for LLM-based MT Evaluation Metrics

Optimising Hard Prompts with Few-Shot Meta-Prompting