Abstract:Dyna-style off-policy model-based reinforcement learning (DMBRL) algorithms are a family of techniques for generating synthetic state transition data and thereby enhancing the sample efficiency of off-policy RL algorithms. This paper identifies and investigates a surprising performance gap observed when applying DMBRL algorithms across different benchmark environments with proprioceptive observations. We show that, while DMBRL algorithms perform well in OpenAI Gym, their performance can drop significantly in DeepMind Control Suite (DMC), even though these settings offer similar tasks and identical physics backends. Modern techniques designed to address several key issues that arise in these settings do not provide a consistent improvement across all environments, and overall our results show that adding synthetic rollouts to the training process -- the backbone of Dyna-style algorithms -- significantly degrades performance across most DMC environments. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of several fundamental challenges in model-based RL and show that, like many optimization fields, there is no free lunch when evaluating performance across diverse benchmarks in RL.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to explore and reveal the performance differences of Dyna - based Model Reinforcement Learning (DMBRL) algorithms in different benchmark environments, especially why these algorithms perform excellently in some environments but degrade significantly in others. Specifically: 1. **Identification and analysis of performance gaps**: - Researchers have found that although Dyna - style algorithms such as MBPO (Model - Based Policy Optimization) perform well in the OpenAI Gym environment, in the DeepMind Control Suite (DMC), even though the tasks are similar and the physical engines are the same, their performance drops significantly. - This phenomenon is not limited to MBPO but also extends to other Dyna - based algorithms, such as Aligned Latent Models (ALM), indicating that this performance gap may not be a problem of specific implementations but a deeper - level challenge. 2. **Exploration of root causes**: - The paper deeply analyzes the possible reasons for this performance gap, including but not limited to model errors, the quality of synthetic data, and the limitations of model prediction capabilities. - Researchers have experimentally verified the negative impact of high model errors on performance and further explored the different manifestations of model errors in different environments. 3. **Attempts at solutions**: - Researchers have tried a variety of modern techniques to alleviate these problems, such as adjusting the ratio of synthetic data to real data, optimizing hyper - parameters, etc., but the results show that these methods have not been able to consistently solve the problem. - In addition, the research also explored the performance of MBPO in an ideal situation (i.e., using a perfect model) to assess whether model error is the only problem. 4. **Limitations of computing resources**: - The paper points out that due to limitations of computing resources, many scientists are unable to reproduce and verify key results, which further hinders in - depth research on these challenges. - To solve this problem, researchers have developed a new implementation based on JAX, which significantly accelerates the experimental process and reduces computing costs. ### Main contributions: - **Empirically demonstrated** the performance gaps of DMBRL methods in different benchmark environments. - **Analyzed and attempted to solve** the root causes of the performance gaps. - **Accelerated the DMBRL experimental process**, enabling more researchers to conduct extensive experiments and evaluations. ### Conclusion: This paper emphasizes the view of "no free lunch" when evaluating model reinforcement learning algorithms in different environments, that is, no algorithm can perform best in all situations. Through detailed research and experiments, the authors reveal the challenges faced by Dyna - based reinforcement learning algorithms in practical applications and provide valuable insights and directions for future research.

Stealing That Free Lunch: Exposing the Limits of Dyna-Style Reinforcement Learning

Dyna-style Model-based reinforcement learning with Model-Free Policy Optimization

Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning Requires Regulating Overfitting

Deep Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for Predictive Control of Robotic Systems with Dense and Sparse Rewards

Efficient Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning Using Learned Dynamics Models

The Impact of Task Underspecification in Evaluating Deep Reinforcement Learning

A Comparative Study of Deep Reinforcement Learning Models: DQN vs PPO vs A2C

Dynamic Observation Policies in Observation Cost-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning

Bridging the gap between Markowitz planning and deep reinforcement learning

The Effective Horizon Explains Deep RL Performance in Stochastic Environments

Understanding and Diagnosing Deep Reinforcement Learning

Bridging RL Theory and Practice with the Effective Horizon

DynaMITE-RL: A Dynamic Model for Improved Temporal Meta-Reinforcement Learning

Benchmarking Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Continuous State and Action Spaces with Dyna and Policy Approximation.

Deep Reinforcement Learning Versus Evolution Strategies: A Comparative Survey

Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithms

Is Deep Reinforcement Learning Really Superhuman on Atari? Leveling the playing field

Leveraging Demonstrations for Deep Reinforcement Learning on Robotics Problems with Sparse Rewards

D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning

Dissecting Deep RL with High Update Ratios: Combatting Value Divergence