Abstract:Deep learning models struggle with compositional generalization, i.e. the ability to recognize or generate novel combinations of observed elementary concepts. In hopes of enabling compositional generalization, various unsupervised learning algorithms have been proposed with inductive biases that aim to induce compositional structure in learned representations (e.g. disentangled representation and emergent language learning). In this work, we evaluate these unsupervised learning algorithms in terms of how well they enable compositional generalization. Specifically, our evaluation protocol focuses on whether or not it is easy to train a simple model on top of the learned representation that generalizes to new combinations of compositional factors. We systematically study three unsupervised representation learning algorithms - $\beta$-VAE, $\beta$-TCVAE, and emergent language (EL) autoencoders - on two datasets that allow directly testing compositional generalization. We find that directly using the bottleneck representation with simple models and few labels may lead to worse generalization than using representations from layers before or after the learned representation itself. In addition, we find that the previously proposed metrics for evaluating the levels of compositionality are not correlated with actual compositional generalization in our framework. Surprisingly, we find that increasing pressure to produce a disentangled representation produces representations with worse generalization, while representations from EL models show strong compositional generalization. Taken together, our results shed new light on the compositional generalization behavior of different unsupervised learning algorithms with a new setting to rigorously test this behavior, and suggest the potential benefits of delevoping EL learning algorithms for more generalizable representations.

Consistency of Compositional Generalization across Multiple Levels

Maintaining Reasoning Consistency in Compositional Visual Question Answering

Compositional Substitutivity of Visual Reasoning for Visual Question Answering

In-Context Compositional Generalization for Large Vision-Language Models

Consistency Regularization Training for Compositional Generalization.

Compositional Generalization by Learning Analytical Expressions.

Learning to Compose Representations of Different Encoder Layers towards Improving Compositional Generalization

A General Theory for Compositional Generalization

Exploring Continual Learning of Compositional Generalization in NLI

Exploring the Effect of Primitives for Compositional Generalization in Vision-and-Language

Compositional Generalization in Unsupervised Compositional Representation Learning: A Study on Disentanglement and Emergent Language

Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?

How Do In-Context Examples Affect Compositional Generalization?

Concepts, Properties and an Approach for Compositional Generalization

Benchmarking and Improving Compositional Generalization of Multi-aspect Controllable Text Generation

Towards Understanding the Relationship between In-context Learning and Compositional Generalization

Enhancing Compositional Generalization via Compositional Feature Alignment

On Compositional Generalization of Neural Machine Translation

A Study of Compositional Generalization in Neural Models

Unobserved Local Structures Make Compositional Generalization Hard

On Evaluating Multilingual Compositional Generalization with Translated Datasets