Abstract:Gradient Descent (GD) and Conjugate Gradient (CG) methods are among the most effective iterative algorithms for solving unconstrained optimization problems, particularly in machine learning and statistical modeling, where they are employed to minimize cost functions. In these algorithms, tunable parameters, such as step sizes or conjugate parameters, play a crucial role in determining key performance metrics, like runtime and solution quality. In this work, we introduce a framework that models algorithm selection as a statistical learning problem, and thus learning complexity can be estimated by the pseudo-dimension of the algorithm group. We first propose a new cost measure for unconstrained optimization algorithms, inspired by the concept of primal-dual integral in mixed-integer linear programming. Based on the new cost measure, we derive an improved upper bound for the pseudo-dimension of gradient descent algorithm group by discretizing the set of step size configurations. Moreover, we generalize our findings from gradient descent algorithm to the conjugate gradient algorithm group for the first time, and prove the existence a learning algorithm capable of probabilistically identifying the optimal algorithm with a sufficiently large sample size.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve
This paper aims to solve the learning complexity problems of the Gradient Descent (GD) and Conjugate Gradient (CG) algorithms in unconstrained optimization problems. Specifically, the author introduces a new framework, models algorithm selection as a statistical learning problem, and estimates the learning complexity through the pseudo - dimension.
#### Main research problems:
1. **Limitations of traditional cost functions**: Traditional cost functions are usually based on the number of iterations, which poses challenges when dealing with complex methods such as CG, especially when the scale of the optimization problem is large or computational resources are limited. In such cases, calculating the number of iterations becomes impractical. Moreover, since the number of iterations must be an integer, the learning error \(1+\epsilon\) cannot be further reduced.
2. **Proposing a new cost function**: To solve the above problems, the author introduces a new cost function that calculates the sum of the distances between the current value and the optimal value in each iteration step. This new method can not only be calculated when the iteration has not reached the optimal value, but also measure the performance of the algorithm more effectively.
3. **Extension to the conjugate gradient algorithm**: For the first time, the author extends this framework to the conjugate gradient algorithm and proves that there exists a learning algorithm that can identify the optimal algorithm with probability when the sample size is large enough.
#### Specific objectives:
- Propose a new cost function to measure the performance of GD and CG algorithms more effectively.
- Improve the learning complexity of the GD algorithm under the new cost function.
- Establish the learning complexity results of the CG algorithm, which is the first such research for the CG algorithm.
### Summary of mathematical formulas
1. **New cost function**:
\[
c(A_\rho, x)=\sum_{j = 1}^{M}\|z^*-g_j(z_0,\rho)\|
\]
where \(M\) is the number of iterations, and \(g_j(z_0,\rho)\) represents the result after \(j\) iterations starting from the initial point \(z_0\) with step size \(\rho\).
2. **Error estimation theorem**:
\[
|c(A_\rho, x)-c(A_\eta, x)|\leq C
\]
for any constant \(C>0\) and step sizes \(\rho,\eta\in[\rho_l,\rho_u]\), if \(0\leq\eta - \rho\leq\frac{\beta}{LZ(1 - D(\rho))(1 - D(\rho))^H D(\rho)- 1}C\).
3. **Generalized guarantee theorem**:
\[
m=\tilde{O}\left(\frac{H^3}{\epsilon^2}\right)
\]
There exists a learning algorithm that can learn the optimal algorithm with probability \((C+\epsilon,\delta)\) on \(m\) samples.
4. **Cost function of the conjugate gradient algorithm**:
\[
c(A_{\rho,\eta},x)=\sum_{i = 0}^{M}\|z^*-g_i(z_1,z_0,\rho,\eta)\|
\]
where \(A_{\rho,\eta}\) represents the conjugate gradient algorithm using step size \(\rho\) and conjugate parameter \(\eta\).
### Conclusion
By introducing a new cost function and extending to the conjugate gradient algorithm, this paper significantly improves the learning complexity analysis of the gradient descent and conjugate gradient algorithms. These results provide a theoretical basis for evaluating and optimizing the performance of these algorithms in large - scale data and complex models.