Abstract:We respond to the "Comment on "Reconsidering the nonlinear emergent inductance: time-varying Joule heating and its impact on the AC electrical response"", submitted by Yokouchi et al. (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2407.15682" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15682">arXiv:2407.15682</a>), which refers to our preprint by Furuta et al (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2407.00309" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00309">arXiv:2407.00309</a>). In our preprint, we argued that the nonlinear impedance reported for materials with noncollinear magnetic textures, Gd$_3$Ru$_4$Al$_{12}$, YMn$_6$Sn$_6$, and FeSn$_2$, can be attributed to the considerable contribution of Joule-heating-induced AC electrical response, rather than the emergent electric field (EEF) due to the current-induced-dynamics of magnetic textures. In the comment by Yokouchi et al., the authors presented new data and concluded that the nonlinear impedance previously reported for Gd$_3$Ru$_4$Al$_{12}$ and YMn$_6$Sn$_6$ was not due to Joule heating but to the EEF. After reviewing their data and arguments, we found that (i) they misunderstood the applicability of the Joule heating model discussed in our preprint (<a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="2407.00309" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00309">arXiv:2407.00309</a>), (ii) the data they presented in the comment are affected by extrinsic superconductivity caused during the microfabrication of specimens using focused ion beam (FIB) methods, and (iii) they misinterpreted their new data regarding the magnetic-field-angle dependence of the nonlinear impedance. Thus, we maintain that the nonlinear impedance reported in the literature and the comment includes a considerable impact from Joule heating. Furthermore, we demonstrate that for Gd$_3$Ru$_4$Al$_{12}$, the cross-sectional area dependence of the nonlinear impedance refutes the EEF scenario, and that the sign change of nonlinear resistance observed by Yokouchi \textit{et al.}~is not allowed from the perspective of stability associated with the current-driven EEF.

Comments on "Fundamental nature of the self-field critical current in superconductors",

Fundamental nature of the self-field critical current in superconductors

Comments on "Procedures for proper validation of record critical current density claims" by Chiara Tarantini and David C. Larbalestier

The Critical Current of Disordered Superconductors near T=0

Reply to Comment on "Quantum Force in a Superconductor"

Comment on "Giant Nernst Effect due to Fluctuating Cooper Pairs in Superconductors" by M.N. Serbyn, M.A. Skvortsov, A.A. Varlamov, and V. Galitski

Magnetic field oscillations of the critical current in long ballistic graphene Josephson junctions

Qin Et Al. Reply

Reply to 'Comment on Universal out-of-equilibrium transport in Kondo-correlated quantum dots'

Reply to the Comment of den Hartog and van Wees on "Conductance Fluctuations in Mesoscopic Normal-Metal/Superconductor Samples"

Interpretation of experimental Critical Current Density and Levitation of Superconductors, and a second Temperature Limit to protect Superconductors against Quench

Reply to "Comment on `Towards exact solutions of superconducting $T_c$ induced by electron-phonon interaction' "

On the origin of the controversial electrostatic field effect in superconductors

Reply to "Comment on "Reconsidering the nonlinear emergent inductance: time-varying Joule heating and its impact on the AC electrical response""

Comment on "Magnus force and acoustic Stewart-Tolman effect in type-II superconductors, by Fil et al

Comments on "Translation-invariant bipolarons and the problem of high-temperature superconductivity"

Comment on "Divergent and Ultrahigh Thermal Conductivity in Millimeter-Long Nanotubes".

Numerical solution of Maxwell equations for s-wave superconductors

Superconductivity in atomically thin films: 2D critical state model

Reply to "Comment on 'Fano resonance for Anderson Impurity Systems' "

Comment on Arxiv:1301.3829 and Reply to 'comment on "can Disorder Really Enhance Superconductivity?"' Arxiv:1501.05148 by I.M. Suslov