Physics Playground: Insights from a Qualitative-Quantitative Study about VR-Based Learning

Elena Battipede,Antonella Giangualano,Paolo Boffi,Monica Clerici,Alessandro Calvi,Luca Cassenti,Roberto Cialini,Tristan Lieven Annemie Van Den Weghe,Loredana Addimando,Pier Luca Lanzi,Alberto Gallace

2024-12-17

Abstract:Physics Playground is an immersive Virtual Reality (VR) application designed for educational purposes, featuring a virtual laboratory where users interact with various physics phenomena through guided experiments. This study aims to evaluate the application's design and educational content to facilitate its integration into classroom settings. A quantitative data collection investigated learning outcomes, related confidence, user experience, and perceived cognitive load, through a 2x2 within-between subjects setup, with participants divided into two conditions (VR vs. slideshow) and knowledge levels assessed twice (pre- and post-tests). A qualitative approach included interviews and a focus group to explore education experts' opinions on the overall experience and didactic content. Results showed an improvement in physics knowledge and confidence after the learning experience compared to baseline, regardless of the condition. Despite comparable perceived cognitive load, slideshow learning was slightly more effective in enhancing physics knowledge. However, both qualitative and quantitative results highlighted the immersive advantage of VR in enhancing user satisfaction. This approach pointed out limitations and advantages of VR-based learning, but more research is needed to understand how it can be implemented into broader teaching strategies.

Human-Computer Interaction,Physics Education

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the design and content of an immersive virtual reality (VR) application named "Physics Playground" in education, in order to promote its application in the classroom environment. Specifically, the researchers hope to answer the following two main questions:

1. **Is the Physics Playground application suitable for teaching and learning from the perspectives of design and educational content?**
- To answer this question, the researchers collected the opinions of educational experts through qualitative research, including interviews and focus - group discussions. These feedbacks aim to evaluate the overall experience of the application and the effectiveness of the teaching content.

2. **Is there a difference between learning physics in VR and learning the same concepts through non - immersive and non - interactive means (such as slide shows)?**
- To answer this question, the researchers conducted quantitative research and collected data on the overall experience and learning performance of participants under different learning conditions. This includes comparing the knowledge level, self - confidence, user experience, and perceived cognitive load before and after learning.

### Research Methods

- **Qualitative Research**: Through interviews and focus - group discussions, the opinions of 7 future high - school teachers' students and 6 professors and educational experts were collected to understand their initial impressions of the application and improvement suggestions.

- **Quantitative Research**: 44 participants were randomly assigned to the experimental group (using the VR application) and the control group (using slides). All participants completed a physics test before and after learning and filled out questionnaires regarding user experience, cognitive load, and other relevant indicators.

### Main Findings

1. **User Experience**:
- The VR group was significantly higher than the control group in terms of pleasure quality and overall rating, indicating that VR has advantages in enhancing visual attraction, innovation, and positive emotions.

2. **Learning Effect**:
- Although the pre - learning baseline knowledge of the two groups was similar, the performance of the control group was slightly better than that of the VR group after learning, indicating that traditional slide - based learning has a slight advantage in improving physics knowledge.

3. **Confidence**:
- Both groups showed higher self - confidence after learning, and the learning conditions had no significant impact on the confidence level.

4. **Cognitive Load**:
- No significant difference was found in the perceived cognitive load between the VR group and the control group, which may be because the attractiveness of the VR system reduces the additional cognitive burden.

### Conclusion

Although VR performs well in enhancing user satisfaction and learning experience, traditional learning methods are still slightly better in improving actual physics knowledge. Therefore, the researchers suggest integrating VR into a broader teaching strategy rather than using it as an independent learning tool. Future research should further explore how to optimize the design of VR applications to better support educational goals.