Abstract:Gender bias distorts the economic behavior and outcomes of women and households. We investigate gender biases in property taxes. We analyze records of more than 100,000 property tax appeal hearings and more than 2.7 years of associated audio recordings, considering how panelist and appellant genders associate with hearing outcomes. We first observe that female appellants fare systematically worse than male appellants in their hearings. Second, we show that, whereas male appellants' hearing outcomes do not vary meaningfully with the gender composition of the panel they face, those of female appellants' do, such that female appellants obtain systematically lesser (greater) reductions to their home values when facing female (male) panelists. Employing a multi-modal large language model (M-LLM), we next construct measures of participant behavior and tone from hearing audio recordings. We observe markedly different behaviors between male and female appellants and, in the case of male appellants, we find that these differences also depend on the gender of the panelists they face (e.g., male appellants appear to behave systematically more aggressively towards female panelists). In contrast, the behavior of female appellants remains relatively constant, regardless of their panel's gender. Finally, we show that female appellants continue to fare worse in front of female panels, even when we condition upon the appelant's in-hearing behavior and tone. Our results are thus consistent with the idea that gender biases are driven, at least in part, by unvoiced beliefs and perceptions on the part of ARB panelists. Our study documents the presence of gender biases in property appraisal appeal hearings and highlights the potential value of generative AI for analyzing large-scale, unstructured administrative data.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is **the impact of gender bias in property tax appeal hearings**. Specifically, the author studied how gender congruence (i.e., the gender match between the appellant and the members of the hearing jury) affects the outcome of property tax appeals. ### Main problems: 1. **The impact of gender differences on the outcome of property tax appeals**: Are female appellants more difficult to obtain favorable results in hearings than male appellants? 2. **The impact of the gender composition of the jury**: Are there significant differences in the performance and results of appellants when facing juries of different genders? 3. **Differences in behavior and tone**: Are there differences in the behavior and tone of male and female appellants in hearings? Are these differences related to the gender of the jury? 4. **Unexpressed bias**: Do jury members unconsciously have gender bias, thus affecting the results of the hearings? ### Research background: - **The importance of property tax**: Property tax is the second - largest source of tax revenue in the United States and is crucial to local governments. - **The appeal process**: Homeowners can object to the assessed value and seek to reduce the tax burden. - **The structure of the hearing**: Appeals are usually adjudicated by a jury (Appraisal Review Board, ARB). ### Research methods: - **Data analysis**: The author analyzed the records of more than 100,000 property tax appeal hearings and more than 2.7 years of relevant audio recordings. - **Multi - modal large language model (M - LLM)**: Use AI tools such as Gemini 1.5 Flash to analyze audio data and label the behavior and tone of participants. - **Regression analysis**: Isolate the influence perceived by jury members by controlling the behavior and tone of appellants. ### Main findings: 1. **Female appellants are generally at a disadvantage**: The performance of female appellants in hearings is significantly worse than that of male appellants. 2. **The impact of the gender composition of the jury**: When facing a female jury, female appellants receive a smaller tax reduction; while male appellants show more aggressive behavior when facing a female jury, but are still more likely to obtain favorable results. 3. **Behavior differences**: Male appellants are more likely to show hostility, raise their voices or interrupt jury members when facing a female jury; while the behavior of female appellants is relatively stable. 4. **Unexpressed bias**: Even after controlling the behavior and tone of appellants, female appellants are still more difficult to obtain favorable results when facing a female jury, indicating that jury members may have unexpressed gender bias. ### Conclusion: This study shows that there is obvious gender bias in property tax appeal hearings. This bias not only affects the results of female appellants, but also reveals potential structural problems. The study emphasizes the importance of fairness and transparency in the tax system and calls on policymakers to pay attention to such biases to ensure the fairness of administrative procedures.

Gender Bias and Property Taxes

Gender In-Group Bias: Evidence from Judicial Decisions

Gender Attitudes in the Judiciary: Evidence from US Circuit Courts

The impact of maleness on judicial decision making: masculinity, chivalry, and immigration appeals

Gendered taxes: the interaction of tax policy with gender equality

Gender differences in research grant allocation -- a mixed picture

Gender bias in teaching evaluations: the causal role of department gender composition

Sexism in the Judiciary

Gender Bias in English: In Search of Fair Language

Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters

Jurors’ Responses to Expert Witness Testimony: The Effects of Gender Stereotypes

Discrimination and Constraints: Evidence from The Voice

Gender Bias in Artificial Intelligence-Written Letters of Reference

Gendered Words and Grant Rates: A Textual Analysis of Disparate Outcomes in the Patent System

Do Judges Exhibit Gender Bias? Evidence from the Universe of Divorce Cases in China

Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review

Ascriptive Characteristics and Perceptions of Impropriety in the Rule of Law: Race, Gender, and Public Assessments of Whether Judges Can Be Impartial

Gender composition predicts gender bias: A meta-reanalysis of hiring discrimination audit experiments

Gender Bias and Sexism in Language

Gender Bias Detection in Court Decisions: A Brazilian Case Study

Salary History and Employer Demand: Evidence from a Two-Sided Audit