Multiplexing in Networks and Diffusion

Arun G. Chandrasekhar,Vasu Chaudhary,Benjamin Golub,Matthew O. Jackson

2024-12-17

Abstract:Social and economic networks are often multiplexed, meaning that people are connected by different types of relationships -- such as borrowing goods and giving advice. We make three contributions to the study of multiplexing. First, we document empirical multiplexing patterns in Indian village data: relationships such as socializing, advising, helping, and lending are correlated but distinct, while commonly used proxies for networks based on ethnicity and geography are nearly uncorrelated with actual relationships. Second, we examine how these layers and their overlap affect information diffusion in a field experiment. The advice network is the best predictor of diffusion, but combining layers improves predictions further. Villages with greater overlap between layers (more multiplexing) experience less overall diffusion. This leads to our third contribution: developing a model and theoretical results about diffusion in multiplex networks. Multiplexing slows the spread of simple contagions, such as diseases or basic information, but can either impede or enhance the spread of complex contagions, such as new technologies, depending on their virality. Finally, we identify differences in multiplexing by gender and connectedness. These have implications for inequality in diffusion-mediated outcomes such as access to information and adherence to norms.

General Economics,Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on the impact of multiplexing in social and economic networks on information diffusion. Specifically, the authors explored the following issues:

1. **Patterns of multiplexing relationships**: Research on the correlations and uniqueness among different types of social relationships (such as socializing, giving advice, helping, lending, etc.) in Indian villages. The authors found that although these different types of relationships are inter - related, they each have their own characteristics, and the commonly used proxy variables constructed based on ethnicity or geographical location are hardly related to the actual relationships.

2. **The impact of multiplexing relationships on information diffusion**: Through field experiments, the authors examined how these different - level relationships and their overlaps affect information diffusion. The research shows that the advice network is the best indicator for predicting information diffusion, but combining multiple levels can further improve the prediction accuracy. In addition, the more overlaps there are between levels within the village (that is, the stronger the multiplexing relationships are), the less the overall amount of information diffusion is.

3. **Development of theoretical models**: In order to understand the above phenomena, the authors developed a new model of information diffusion in multiplex networks and obtained theoretical results. This model shows that multiplex relationships will slow down the spread speed of simple contagions (such as diseases or basic information), but the impact on complex contagions (such as new technologies) depends on their transmissibility - it may either hinder or promote their spread.

4. **Differences in gender and connectivity**: The authors also found differences in multiplex relationships in terms of gender and individual connectivity, which indicates that there are inequalities among different groups of people in network - mediated outcomes (such as information acquisition and norm compliance).

In summary, this paper aims to deeply understand the structural characteristics of multiplex relationships in social and economic networks and their impact mechanisms on information diffusion, thereby providing new perspectives and evidence for theoretical and empirical research in related fields.