Abstract:Domain Adaptive Object Detection (DAOD) transfers knowledge from a labeled source domain to an unannotated target domain under closed-set assumption. Universal DAOD (UniDAOD) extends DAOD to handle open-set, partial-set, and closed-set domain adaptation. In this paper, we first unveil two issues: domain-private category alignment is crucial for global-level features, and the domain probability heterogeneity of features across different levels. To address these issues, we propose a novel Dual Probabilistic Alignment (DPA) framework to model domain probability as Gaussian distribution, enabling the heterogeneity domain distribution sampling and measurement. The DPA consists of three tailored modules: the Global-level Domain Private Alignment (GDPA), the Instance-level Domain Shared Alignment (IDSA), and the Private Class Constraint (PCC). GDPA utilizes the global-level sampling to mine domain-private category samples and calculate alignment weight through a cumulative distribution function to address the global-level private category alignment. IDSA utilizes instance-level sampling to mine domain-shared category samples and calculates alignment weight through Gaussian distribution to conduct the domain-shared category domain alignment to address the feature heterogeneity. The PCC aggregates domain-private category centroids between feature and probability spaces to mitigate negative transfer. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our DPA outperforms state-of-the-art UniDAOD and DAOD methods across various datasets and scenarios, including open, partial, and closed sets. Codes are available at \url{<a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/zyfone/DPA" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>}.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to solve two key problems in **Universal Domain Adaptive Object Detection (UniDAOD)**: 1. **Neglect of global feature alignment for private classes**: - Existing UniDAOD methods mainly focus on the alignment of shared classes and ignore the alignment of private classes at the global feature level. Through experiments, the authors found that global features are more inclined to align private classes, while instance features are more inclined to align shared classes. This phenomenon indicates that existing methods ignore the alignment of private classes at the global feature level, resulting in sub - optimal domain alignment effects. 2. **Heterogeneity of different feature levels**: - There are significant differences in the representation of global features and instance features, resulting in different probability distributions in different domains. Existing methods deal with this problem by setting different thresholds and entropy functions, but these methods require manual parameter adjustment, are highly complex, and are difficult to adapt to detection tasks. To solve these problems, the authors propose a new **Dual Probabilistic Alignment (DPA) framework**. The DPA framework consists of three modules: - **Global - level Domain Private Alignment (GDPA)**: Used to align private classes at the global feature level. - **Instance - level Domain Shared Alignment (IDSA)**: Used to align shared classes at the instance feature level. - **Private Class Constraint (PCC)**: Used to reduce negative transfer caused by the alignment of private classes. Through these modules, the DPA framework can effectively handle domain - adaptive object detection tasks in open - set, partial - set, and closed - set scenarios and has achieved better performance than existing methods on multiple datasets. ### Summary of mathematical formulas 1. **Error risk decomposition**: \[ \epsilon(h)=\int_{x}|h(x)-\psi(x)|P_{x,\psi}dx = \int_{x_c}F_{h,\psi}P_{x,\psi}dx+\int_{x_{c^*}}F_{h,\psi}P_{x,\psi}dx=\epsilon_c(h)+\epsilon_{c^*}(h) \] where \(\epsilon_c(h)\) and \(\epsilon_{c^*}(h)\) are the error risks of shared classes and private classes respectively. 2. **Upper bound of error risk**: \[ \epsilon_t^c(h)\leq \underbrace{\epsilon_s(h)}_{L_{det}}-\underbrace{\epsilon_t^{c^*}(h)}_{L_{PCC}}+\underbrace{d_H(D_s^c,D_t^c)}_{L_{IDSA}}+\underbrace{d_H(D_s^{c^*},D_t^{c^*})}_{L_{GDPA}}+\text{other terms} \] 3. **Global - level sampling**: \[ \Omega_{neg}^g = \{i\mid \|x_i - C\|_2>d\}, \quad \Omega_{pos}^g = \{i\mid \|x_i - C\|_2\leq d\} \] where \(C\) is the dynamic feature center and \(d\) is the learnable radius. 4. **Cumulative distribution function (CDF) calculation weight**: \[ \Phi(z)=\frac{1}{2} \left[

Universal Domain Adaptive Object Detection via Dual Probabilistic Alignment

HOMDA: High-Order Moment-Based Domain Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation

Universal Domain Adaptive Object Detector

Dual Contrastive Universal Adaptation Network.

Joint Distribution Alignment via Adversarial Learning for Domain Adaptive Object Detection

Learning to Detect Open Classes for Universal Domain Adaptation

Domain Consensus Clustering for Universal Domain Adaptation

DSCA: A Dual Semantic Correlation Alignment Method for domain adaptation object detection

Geometric Anchor Correspondence Mining with Uncertainty Modeling for Universal Domain Adaptation

A Pairwise DomMix Attentive Adversarial Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptive Object Detection

Unified Optimal Transport Framework for Universal Domain Adaptation

Enhanced Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Dual-Attention Between Classification and Domain Alignment.

Partial Alignment for Object Detection in the Wild

Unsupervised domain adaptation via double classifiers based on high confidence pseudo label

Universal Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation by Mitigating Common-Class Bias

Robust Domain Adaptive Object Detection with Unified Multi-Granularity Alignment

Open-Scenario Domain Adaptive Object Detection in Autonomous Driving

Domain Adaptive Object Detection via Feature Separation and Alignment

Universal multi-Source domain adaptation for image classification

Tight Source Domain Match for Partial Domain Adaptation Based on Maximum Density

Open Set Domain Adaptation: Theoretical Bound and Algorithm