Abstract:Background: Many promising artificial intelligence (AI) and computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems have been developed, but few have been successfully integrated into clinical practice. This is partially owing to a lack of user-centered design of AI-based computer-aided detection or diagnosis (AI-CAD) systems. Objective: We aimed to assess the impact of different onboarding tutorials and levels of AI model explainability on radiologists' trust in AI and the use of AI recommendations in lung nodule assessment on computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: In total, 20 radiologists from 7 Dutch medical centers performed lung nodule assessment on CT scans under different conditions in a simulated use study as part of a 2×2 repeated-measures quasi-experimental design. Two types of AI onboarding tutorials (reflective vs informative) and 2 levels of AI output (black box vs explainable) were designed. The radiologists first received an onboarding tutorial that was either informative or reflective. Subsequently, each radiologist assessed 7 CT scans, first without AI recommendations. AI recommendations were shown to the radiologist, and they could adjust their initial assessment. Half of the participants received the recommendations via black box AI output and half received explainable AI output. Mental model and psychological trust were measured before onboarding, after onboarding, and after assessing the 7 CT scans. We recorded whether radiologists changed their assessment on found nodules, malignancy prediction, and follow-up advice for each CT assessment. In addition, we analyzed whether radiologists' trust in their assessments had changed based on the AI recommendations. Results: Both variations of onboarding tutorials resulted in a significantly improved mental model of the AI-CAD system (informative P=.01 and reflective P=.01). After using AI-CAD, psychological trust significantly decreased for the group with explainable AI output (P=.02). On the basis of the AI recommendations, radiologists changed the number of reported nodules in 27 of 140 assessments, malignancy prediction in 32 of 140 assessments, and follow-up advice in 12 of 140 assessments. The changes were mostly an increased number of reported nodules, a higher estimated probability of malignancy, and earlier follow-up. The radiologists' confidence in their found nodules changed in 82 of 140 assessments, in their estimated probability of malignancy in 50 of 140 assessments, and in their follow-up advice in 28 of 140 assessments. These changes were predominantly increases in confidence. The number of changed assessments and radiologists' confidence did not significantly differ between the groups that received different onboarding tutorials and AI outputs. Conclusions: Onboarding tutorials help radiologists gain a better understanding of AI-CAD and facilitate the formation of a correct mental model. If AI explanations do not consistently substantiate the probability of malignancy across patient cases, radiologists' trust in the AI-CAD system can be impaired. Radiologists' confidence in their assessments was improved by using the AI recommendations.

The Impact of AI Explanations on Clinicians Trust and Diagnostic Accuracy in Breast Cancer

Effect of AI Explanations on Human Perceptions of Patient-Facing AI-Powered Healthcare Systems

Examining the effect of explanation on satisfaction and trust in AI diagnostic systems

Care to Explain? AI Explanation Types Differentially Impact Chest Radiograph Diagnostic Performance and Physician Trust in AI

The Impact of Explanations on Layperson Trust in Artificial Intelligence-Driven Symptom Checker Apps: Experimental Study

Assessing the communication gap between AI models and healthcare professionals: explainability, utility and trust in AI-driven clinical decision-making

Reporting radiographers' interaction with Artificial Intelligence-How do different forms of AI feedback impact trust and decision switching?

Transparent precision: Explainable AI empowered breast cancer recommendations for personalized treatment

Evaluating the clinical utility of artificial intelligence assistance and its explanation on the glioma grading task

Evaluation of Popular XAI Applied to Clinical Prediction Models: Can They be Trusted?

Explainable AI for clinical risk prediction: a survey of concepts, methods, and modalities

Explainable machine learning for breast cancer diagnosis from mammography and ultrasound images: a systematic review

Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Exploration of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Techniques

Understanding the Effect of Counterfactual Explanations on Trust and Reliance on AI for Human-AI Collaborative Clinical Decision Making

Comparison of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Model and Radiologist Review Performances to Detect Breast Cancer in 752 Patients

Explainable artificial intelligence in breast cancer detection and risk prediction: A systematic scoping review

User Trust and Understanding of Explainable AI: Exploring Algorithm Visualisations and User Biases

Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Quantifying Breast Cancer Factors: Saudi Arabia Context

The Impact of Expectation Management and Model Transparency on Radiologists' Trust and Utilization of AI Recommendations for Lung Nodule Assessment on Computed Tomography: Simulated Use Study

Trusting AI made decisions in healthcare by making them explainable

Enhancing Cancer Diagnosis with Explainable & Trustworthy Deep Learning Models