Abstract:The proliferation of heterogeneous configurations in distributed systems presents significant challenges in ensuring stability and efficiency. Misconfigurations, driven by complex parameter interdependencies, can lead to critical failures. Group Testing (GT) has been leveraged to expedite troubleshooting by reducing the number of tests, as demonstrated by methods like ZebraConf. However, ZebraConf's binary-splitting strategy suffers from sequential testing, limited handling of parameter interdependencies, and susceptibility to errors such as noise and dilution. We propose Ba-ZebraConf, a novel three-dimensional Bayesian framework that addresses these limitations. It integrates (1) Bayesian Group Testing (BGT), which employs probabilistic lattice models and the Bayesian Halving Algorithm (BHA) to dynamically refine testing strategies, prioritizing high-informative parameters and adapting to real-time outcomes. Bayesian optimization tunes hyperparameters, such as pool sizes and test thresholds, to maximize testing efficiency. (2) Bayesian Optimization (BO) to automate hyperparameter tuning for test efficiency, and (3) Bayesian Risk Refinement (BRR) to iteratively capture parameter interdependencies and improve classification accuracy. Ba-ZebraConf adapts to noisy environments, captures parameter interdependencies, and scales effectively for large configuration spaces. Experimental results show that Ba-ZebraConf reduces test counts and execution time by 67% compared to ZebraConf while achieving 0% false positives and false negatives. These results establish Ba-ZebraConf as a robust and scalable solution for troubleshooting heterogeneous distributed systems.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the problems of system fault diagnosis and troubleshooting in distributed systems due to heterogeneous configurations. Specifically, it aims to address the following challenges:
1. **Efficient Fault Troubleshooting in Large - scale Configuration Spaces**: Traditional methods such as ZebraConf use a binary - splitting strategy for group testing. However, this method is inefficient when dealing with large - scale configurations because it requires multiple sequential testing phases.
2. **Robustness in Noisy Environments**: In real - world testing environments, there are noise and dilution effects, which will lead to an increase in false positives and false negatives. Existing methods are difficult to deal with these noise interferences.
3. **Handling of Dependencies between Parameters**: In heterogeneous systems, the dependencies between parameters make fault troubleshooting complicated. For example, the configuration of one parameter may mask the fault of another parameter, causing some group tests to be unable to correctly identify the real faulty parameter.
4. **Hyper - parameter Optimization**: In order to adapt to different workloads and system conditions, it is necessary to dynamically adjust key hyper - parameters such as pool size and classification thresholds to optimize resource allocation and testing strategies.
To solve the above problems, the paper proposes the Ba - ZebraConf framework, which is a three - dimensional Bayesian framework integrating three complementary Bayesian methods:
- **Bayesian Group Testing (BGT)**: Replace the binary - splitting with a probability lattice model, and dynamically adjust the testing strategy through the Bayesian Halving Algorithm (BHA), giving priority to high - risk configurations and adapting to noisy results.
- **Bayesian Optimization (BO)**: Automatically adjust key hyper - parameters (such as pool size, prior probability, classification thresholds, etc.), and use a Gaussian - process - based surrogate model and an acquisition function (such as the Expected Improvement function) to optimize resource allocation and testing efficiency.
- **Bayesian Risk Refinement (BRR)**: By iteratively updating the risk assessment of each parameter, accumulate evidence and automatically capture the dependencies between parameters, so as to classify more confidently, reduce redundant tests, and improve accuracy and efficiency.
By combining these three Bayesian methods, Ba - ZebraConf can effectively deal with the fault troubleshooting problems in large - scale configuration spaces and provides a more efficient, accurate and adaptable solution.
### Formula Summary
1. **Posterior Probability Update Formula in Bayesian Group Testing**:
\[
P(x|y)=\frac{P(y|x)P(x)}{P(y)}
\]
where \(P(x)\) is the prior probability, \(P(y|x)\) is the likelihood function, and \(P(y)\) is the normalization factor.
2. **Risk Assessment Update Formula in Bayesian Risk Refinement**:
\[
P(R_{i}^{(t)}|\text{tests})=\frac{P(\text{tests}|R_{i}^{(t)})P(R_{i}^{(t)})}{P(\text{tests})}
\]
where \(R_{i}^{(t)}\) is the risk level of the \(i\) - th parameter after \(t\) tests, \(P(R_{i}^{(t)})\) is the prior risk estimate, and \(P(\text{tests}|R_{i}^{(t)})\) is the likelihood function of observing the test results under the given risk level.
3. **Expected Improvement Function in Bayesian Optimization**:
\[
\alpha(x)=E[\max(f(x)-f_{\text{best}}, 0)]
\]
where \(f_{\text{best}}\) is the best value observed so far.
These formulas ensure the efficiency and accuracy of the Ba - ZebraConf framework when dealing with complex system configurations.