Shaping the Future of Social Media with Middleware

Luke Hogg,Renée DiResta,Francis Fukuyama,Richard Reisman,Daphne Keller,Aviv Ovadya,Luke Thorburn,Jonathan Stray,Shubhi Mathur

2024-12-14

Abstract:Middleware, third-party software intermediaries between users and platforms, has been broached as a means to decentralize the power of social media platforms and enhance user agency. Middleware may enable a more user-centric and democratic approach to shaping digital experiences, offering a flexible architecture as an alternative to both centrally controlled, opaque platforms and an unmoderated, uncurated internet. The widespread adoption of open middleware has long hinged on the cooperation of established major platforms; however, the recent growth of federated platforms, such as Mastodon and Bluesky, has led to increased offerings and user awareness. In this report we consider the potential of middleware as a means of enabling greater user control over curation and moderation - two aspects of the social media experience that are often mired in controversy. We evaluate the trade-offs and negative externalities it might create, and discuss the technological, regulatory, and market dynamics that could either support or hinder its implementation.

Computers and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to explore and solve the problem of excessive concentration of power brought about by the centralization of current social media platforms. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Concentration of platform power**:
- Current social media platforms (such as Facebook, Twitter, etc.) have great influence and can control the content that users see and the way information is spread. This centralized power may lead to abuse, such as manipulating public opinion, influencing elections or promoting harmful content.

2. **Lack of user autonomy**:
- Users have almost no choice on these platforms and cannot independently decide the content they want to see or how to manage their social experiences. This has led to user dissatisfaction with the platform's content management and review policies.

3. **Challenges in content management and review**:
- Platforms face great challenges in dealing with harmful content (such as hate speech, false information). On the one hand, platforms need to safeguard the right to free expression; on the other hand, they also need to ensure that the content on the platform is safe and appropriate. This balance is difficult to achieve and is prone to controversy.

4. **Social and political impacts**:
- Social media platforms have an increasing impact on public discourse and have become important tools for political mobilization and social movements. However, this also brings new risks, such as increased polarization and threats to democratic systems.

In order to solve these problems, the paper proposes the concept of "middleware". Middleware is a third - party software intermediary located between users and platforms, providing flexible content management and review services. By introducing middleware, the paper hopes to achieve the following goals:

- **Decentralize power**: Reduce the platform's absolute control over user content and give users more choices and autonomy.
- **Enhance user agency**: Users can choose different middleware service providers and customize content filtering and recommendation systems according to their own needs.
- **Promote innovation**: Create an open competitive environment and encourage more innovative services and technologies to emerge.
- **Address content management challenges**: Through community - driven review tools and enhanced user control, better handle harmful content and false information.

In short, this paper attempts to reshape the social media ecosystem by introducing middleware to make it more democratic, transparent and user - friendly.