On the Use of Letters of Recommendation in Astronomy and Astrophysics Graduate Admissions

Darcy Barron,Rachel Bezanson,Laura Blecha,Laura Chomiuk,Lia Corrales,Vera Gluscevic,Kristen McQuinn,Anne Medling,Noel Richardson,Ryan Trainor,Jessica Werk

2024-12-12

Abstract:Letters of recommendation are a common tool used in graduate admissions. Most admissions systems require three letters for each applicant, burdening both letter writers and admissions committees with a heavy work load that may not be time well-spent. Most applicants do not have three research advisors who can comment meaningfully on research readiness, adding a large number of letters that are not useful. Ideally, letters of recommendation will showcase the students' promise for a research career, but in practice, the letters often do not fulfill this purpose. As a group of early and mid-career faculty who write dozens of letters every year for promising undergraduates, we are concerned and overburdened by the inefficiencies of the current system. In this open letter to the AAS Graduate Admissions Task Force, we offer an alternative to the current use of letters of recommendation: a portfolio submitted by the student, which highlights e.g., a paper, plot, or presentation that represents their past work and readiness for grad school, uploaded to a centralized system used by astronomy and astrophysics PhD programs. While we argue that we could eliminate letters in this new paradigm, it may instead be advisable to limit the number of letters of recommendation to one per applicant.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics,Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the inefficiency and unfairness of the recommendation letter system in current astronomy and astrophysics graduate admission applications. Specifically, the authors believe that the current recommendation letter system has the following main problems:

1. **Overburden**: Most graduate admission application systems require each applicant to submit three recommendation letters, which brings a huge workload to recommendation letter writers and admission committees. Many students are unable to find three recommenders who can deeply evaluate their research abilities, resulting in many recommendation letters being of low quality or having empty content.

2. **Redundant Information and Bias**: The content of recommendation letters often lacks direct assessment of students' actual research abilities, but more subjective evaluations and personal biases. In addition, the lack of unified recommendation letter scoring standards further intensifies the subjectivity and bias of evaluations.

3. **Inequality of Resources**: Students from smaller or less - resourced institutions are at a disadvantage in finding recommenders because they may not have enough opportunities to participate in multiple research projects, or their recommenders are not familiar with how to write effective recommendation letters.

4. **Gender and Racial Bias**: Research shows that the content of recommendation letters can be influenced by the applicant's gender and race. Recommendation letters for female and minority students often contain more negative evaluations or uncertain descriptions, even if their grades are equivalent to those of other students.

To solve these problems, the authors propose an alternative: replacing recommendation letters with student portfolios. Specific suggestions are as follows:

- **Student Portfolio**: Students can submit 1 - 2 works (such as papers, posters, code samples, etc.) that they think can represent their research abilities and potential, and attach a brief self - introduction to explain the background of these works and their relevance to graduate study.

- **Mentor Situational Statement**: Each student designates 1 - 2 mentors to provide a brief situational statement for their works, focusing on evaluating the student's contribution in the works and supplementing the student's strengths and weaknesses.

This new method aims to more directly assess students' actual abilities, reduce the subjectivity and bias brought by recommendation letters, while reducing the workload of recommenders and admission committees, and promoting a more fair and efficient graduate admission process.

In this way, the authors hope to improve the existing graduate admission application process, making it more just, transparent, and better reflecting students' true strength and potential.