Abstract:This paper investigates the impact of rigid communication topologies (RCTs) on the performance of vehicular platoons, aiming to identify beneficial features in RCTs that enhance vehicles behavior. We introduce four performance metrics, focusing on safety, energy consumption, passenger comfort, and robustness of vehicular platoons. The safety metric is based on momentary distances between neighboring vehicles, their relative velocities, and relative accelerations. Thus, to have access to these relative values, we formulate the coupled dynamics between pairs of neighboring vehicles, considering initial conditions (position, velocity, acceleration), leader vehicle's velocity/acceleration trajectory, deployed RCT, and vehicles' parity/disparity. By decoupling the dynamics using a mapping matrix structured on deployed RCT, vehicles' features, and control gains, precise formulations for distance errors, relative velocities, and relative accelerations between all neighboring vehicles, over the travel time, are obtained. Comparing performance metric results across RCTs highlights that downstream information transmission-from vehicles ahead, particularly the leader vehicle, to vehicles behind-significantly enhances platoon stability, safety, energy consumption, and passenger comfort metrics. Conversely, receiving state information from vehicles behind degrades metrics, compromising safety, increasing energy consumption, and reducing passenger comfort. These findings underscore that forward-looking, leader-centric communications between vehicles markedly enhance platoon efficiency and safety.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to study the impact of rigid communication topologies (RCTs) on the performance of vehicle platoons. Specifically, the authors aim to identify the beneficial features in RCTs that can enhance the behavior of vehicles. To achieve this goal, the paper introduces four performance indicators, focusing on safety, energy consumption, passenger comfort, and robustness. By analyzing the impact of different RCTs on these performance indicators, the study finds that the forward communication strategy of transmitting information from the front vehicle to the rear vehicle can significantly improve the stability and safety of the platoon, reduce energy consumption, and enhance passenger comfort. Conversely, receiving state information from the rear vehicle will degrade these performance indicators, increase safety risks, increase energy consumption, and reduce passenger comfort.
The main contribution of the paper lies in providing a comprehensive analysis framework for evaluating the impact of different RCTs on the performance of vehicle platoons. By establishing a coupled - dynamics model between adjacent vehicles and decoupling these dynamics using a mapping matrix, the authors obtain accurate expressions for distance error, relative velocity, and relative acceleration. Based on these relative measurements, four key performance indicators are defined and analyzed, thereby systematically evaluating the impact of different RCTs on platoon performance.
Specifically, the research results of the paper show that:
- Forward communication strategies (such as TPFL, MPF, PFL, and BDL) outperform communication topologies that mainly receive information from the rear vehicle (such as BD and SPTF) in terms of safety, energy consumption, robustness, and passenger comfort.
- For larger - scale platoons, forward, leader - centered communication strategies (such as TPFL and PFL) generally exhibit better performance.
These findings provide important theoretical basis and technical support for the development of more efficient and optimized vehicle platoon systems.