Abstract:Algorithm audits are powerful tools for studying black-box systems without direct knowledge of their inner workings. While very effective in examining technical components, the method stops short of a sociotechnical frame, which would also consider users themselves as an integral and dynamic part of the system. Addressing this limitation, we propose the concept of sociotechnical auditing: auditing methods that evaluate algorithmic systems at the sociotechnical level, focusing on the interplay between algorithms and users as each impacts the other. Just as algorithm audits probe an algorithm with varied inputs and observe outputs, a sociotechnical audit (STA) additionally probes users, exposing them to different algorithmic behavior and measuring their resulting attitudes and behaviors. As an example of this method, we develop Intervenr, a platform for conducting browser-based, longitudinal sociotechnical audits with consenting, compensated participants. Intervenr investigates the algorithmic content users encounter online, and also coordinates systematic client-side interventions to understand how users change in response. As a case study, we deploy Intervenr in a two-week sociotechnical audit of online advertising (N = 244) to investigate the central premise that personalized ad targeting is more effective on users. In the first week, we observe and collect all browser ads delivered to users, and in the second, we deploy an ablation-style intervention that disrupts normal targeting by randomly pairing participants and swapping all their ads. We collect user-oriented metrics (self-reported ad interest and feeling of representation) and advertiser-oriented metrics (ad views, clicks, and recognition) throughout, along with a total of over 500,000 ads. Our STA finds that targeted ads indeed perform better with users, but also that users begin to acclimate to different ads in only a week, casting doubt on the primacy of personalized ad targeting given the impact of repeated exposure. In comparison with other evaluation methods that only study technical components, or only experiment on users, sociotechnical audits evaluate sociotechnical systems through the interplay of their technical and human components.

Learning about algorithm auditing in five steps: scaffolding how high school youth can systematically and critically evaluate machine learning applications

Youth as Peer Auditors: Engaging Teenagers with Algorithm Auditing of Machine Learning Applications

Everyday Algorithm Auditing: Understanding the Power of Everyday Users in Surfacing Harmful Algorithmic Behaviors

Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm Audits

The algorithm audit: Scoring the algorithms that score us

Participation and Division of Labor in User-Driven Algorithm Audits: How Do Everyday Users Work together to Surface Algorithmic Harms?

Towards algorithm auditing: managing legal, ethical and technological risks of AI, ML and associated algorithms

Experiencing Algorithms: How Young People Understand, Feel About, and Engage With Algorithmic News Selection on Social Media

An Algorithmic Equity Toolkit for Technology Audits by Community Advocates and Activists

Who Audits the Auditors? Recommendations from a field scan of the algorithmic auditing ecosystem

Sociotechnical Audits: Broadening the Algorithm Auditing Lens to Investigate Targeted Advertising

Algorithmic audits of algorithms, and the law

Having your Privacy Cake and Eating it Too: Platform-supported Auditing of Social Media Algorithms for Public Interest

WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AI

Designing an Intervention Tool for End-User Algorithm Audits in Personalized Recommendation Systems

Designing for Critical Algorithmic Literacies

Algorithmic Bias and Risk Assessments: Lessons from Practice

How Auditing Methodologies Can Impact Our Understanding of YouTube's Recommendation Systems

Mapping the Field of Algorithm Auditing: A Systematic Literature Review Identifying Research Trends, Linguistic and Geographical Disparities

Learning about Data, Algorithms, and Algorithmic Justice on TikTok in Personally Meaningful Ways