Abstract:Machine learning (ML), being now widely accessible to the research community at large, has fostered a proliferation of new and striking applications of these emergent mathematical techniques across a wide range of disciplines. In this paper, we will focus on a particular case study: the field of paleoanthropology, which seeks to understand the evolution of the human species based on biological and cultural evidence. As we will show, the easy availability of ML algorithms and lack of expertise on their proper use among the anthropological research community has led to foundational misapplications that have appeared throughout the literature. The resulting unreliable results not only undermine efforts to legitimately incorporate ML into anthropological research, but produce potentially faulty understandings about our human evolutionary and behavioral past. The aim of this paper is to provide a brief introduction to some of the ways in which ML has been applied within paleoanthropology; we also include a survey of some basic ML algorithms for those who are not fully conversant with the field, which remains under active development. We discuss a series of missteps, errors, and violations of correct protocols of ML methods that appear disconcertingly often within the accumulating body of anthropological literature. These mistakes include use of outdated algorithms and practices; inappropriate train/test splits, sample composition, and textual explanations; as well as an absence of transparency due to the lack of data/code sharing, and the subsequent limitations imposed on independent replication. We assert that expanding samples, sharing data and code, re-evaluating approaches to peer review, and, most importantly, developing interdisciplinary teams that include experts in ML are all necessary for progress in future research incorporating ML within anthropology.

Ethnography and Machine Learning: Synergies and New Directions

Machine Learning for Sociology

Econométrie et Machine Learning

Erratum To: Machine Learning Meets Omics Applications and Perspectives

A Collaborative Way of Knowing: Bridging Computational Communication Research and Grounded Theory Ethnography

Synergizing machine learning & symbolic methods: A survey on hybrid approaches to natural language processing

Human-Machine Learning for Data-Driven Scenarios

Lessons from Archives: Strategies for Collecting Sociocultural Data in Machine Learning

Research on the current status and trend of the application of machine learning in the field of literature and museums- Based on CiteSpace

Use and Misuse of Machine Learning in Anthropology

Machine Learning as Grounded Theory: Human-Centered Interfaces for Social Network Research through Artificial Intelligence

Evidence-based medicine and machine learning: a partnership with a common purpose

Argumentation and Machine Learning

Using Machine Learning to Learn Machines: A Cross-Cultural Study of Users’ Responses to Machine-Generated Artworks

Computer-Aided Ethnography in Engineering Design

Machine-assisted quantitizing designs: augmenting humanities and social sciences with artificial intelligence

Machine learning meets omics: applications and perspectives

Towards Effective Collaboration between Software Engineers and Data Scientists developing Machine Learning-Enabled Systems

Machine learning and AI in marketing – Connecting computing power to human insights

Machine Learning Arrives in Archaeology