NLP Cluster Analysis of Common Core State Standards and NAEP Item Specifications

Gregory Camilli,Larry Suter
2024-11-20
Abstract:Camilli (2024) proposed a methodology using natural language processing (NLP) to map the relationship of a set of content standards to item specifications. This study provided evidence that NLP can be used to improve the mapping process. As part of this investigation, the nominal classifications of standards and items specifications were used to examine construct equivalence. In the current paper, we determine the strength of empirical support for the semantic distinctiveness of these classifications, which are known as "domains" for Common Core standards, and "strands" for National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) item specifications. This is accomplished by separate k-means clustering for standards and specifications of their corresponding embedding vectors. We then briefly illustrate an application of these findings.
Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence,Computation and Language
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to explore how to use natural language processing (NLP) techniques to improve the mapping relationship between educational content standards and test item specifications. Specifically, the author attempts to answer the following two main questions: 1. **Consistency between nominal classification and empirical structure**: - The goal of the paper is to determine whether the nominal classifications (i.e., "domains" and "clues") in educational content standards and test item specifications are consistent with their corresponding empirical structures. Through k - means clustering analysis, the author clusters text embedding vectors and compares the degree of matching between these clustering results and the nominal classifications. 2. **Strength of semantic differences**: - The author also attempts to evaluate the semantic distinctiveness of these nominal classifications. In other words, they hope to verify through NLP methods whether these classifications can accurately reflect the actual content differences in different domains. ### Specific research content - **Data sources**: The paper uses the Item Specifications of Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). - **Methods**: Convert text into embedding vectors through NLP techniques, and then use the k - means clustering algorithm to perform clustering analysis on these vectors. Finally, the author compares the matching situation between the clustering results and the nominal classifications. - **Results**: The research shows that most classifications are consistent, but there are some mismatches. For example, in CCSS, there are 6 mismatches, resulting in a classification accuracy rate of 82.5%; while in NAEP, there are 4 mismatches, and the classification accuracy rate is 91.8%. ### Key findings - **Ambiguity of measurement concepts**: The paper points out that the term "measurement" may have different meanings in different contexts. For example, there are differences in the understanding of "measurement" between CCSS and NAEP, which may lead to some standards being misclassified. - **Explanation of classification errors**: The author analyzes in detail some specific classification errors, such as some measurement standards being misclassified into the algebra or geometry domains. This indicates that the current standard classification may have some ambiguity and redundancy. ### Significance This research provides a new perspective for future educational standards and test item development. Through NLP techniques, the mapping relationship between standards and specifications can be detected and improved more effectively, thereby improving the accuracy and consistency of educational assessment. ### Conclusion In general, this paper reveals some potential problems between educational content standards and test item specifications through NLP techniques and proposes improvement suggestions. This not only helps to optimize the educational assessment system but also provides valuable references for future research. --- If you have more specific questions or need further information, please feel free to let me know!