Abstract:E-learning environments are increasingly harnessing large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 for tailored educational support. This study introduces an approach that integrates dynamic knowledge graphs with LLMs to offer nuanced student assistance. By evaluating past and ongoing student interactions, the system identifies and appends the most salient learning context to prompts directed at the LLM. Central to this method is the knowledge graph's role in assessing a student's comprehension of topic prerequisites. Depending on the categorized understanding (good, average, or poor), the LLM adjusts its guidance, offering advanced assistance, foundational reviews, or in-depth prerequisite explanations, respectively. Preliminary findings suggest students could benefit from this tiered support, achieving enhanced comprehension and improved task outcomes. However, several issues related to potential errors arising from LLMs were identified, which can potentially mislead students. This highlights the need for human intervention to mitigate these risks. This research aims to advance AI-driven personalized learning while acknowledging the limitations and potential pitfalls, thus guiding future research in technology and data-driven education.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to use large - language models (LLMs) in combination with dynamic knowledge graphs to provide personalized and adaptive student guidance in e - learning environments. Specifically, the research aims to generate personalized feedback that can accurately address students' learning barriers by evaluating students' current difficulties and knowledge states, thereby improving students' understanding of course content and the effectiveness of task completion.
### Main Objectives of the Paper:
1. **How to provide personalized guidance based on students' current difficulties and knowledge states?**
- The research constructs a dynamic knowledge graph, evaluates students' knowledge states, and passes them as input to large - language models (such as ChatGPT) to generate personalized feedback.
2. **Can large - language models generate correct answers to accurately address students' learning difficulties?**
- Through experimental verification, the research evaluates ChatGPT's performance among different student types (poor - foundation, medium - level, high - level), especially the effectiveness and accuracy in generating personalized feedback.
### Solutions:
- **Construction of Knowledge Graph**: The research uses a simplified version of the knowledge graph to extract mathematical concepts and their relationships from textbooks and establish a structured knowledge system.
- **Question Retrieval and Ranking**: Based on the knowledge graph, determine the prerequisite knowledge for each concept and generate corresponding feedback for questions of different difficulties.
- **Identification of Students' Difficulties**: Assume that students will input specific questions or the system will automatically detect students' difficulties in the problem - solving process, and experts estimate the possible difficulties that different types of students may encounter according to the standard answers.
- **Generation of Personalized Solutions Based on LLM**: Use ChatGPT to generate personalized feedback for students' specific difficulties, ensuring that the feedback content can accurately solve students' actual problems.
### Experimental Design:
- **Experimental Setup**: Select questions of different difficulties (easy, medium, difficult), corresponding to different types of students (S1, S2, S3) respectively, and generate personalized feedback.
- **Evaluation Methods**:
- **ROUGE Evaluation**: Evaluate the quality and degree of personalization of the feedback by comparing the standard answers with the generated personalized feedback.
- **Expert Evaluation**: Invite experts to score the generated feedback in terms of correctness, precision, hallucination tendency, and variability.
### Preliminary Results:
- **Simple Questions (Type A)**: For simple questions, the feedback for different types of students (S1, S2, S3) is highly consistent with the standard answers, indicating that the feedback requirements for simple questions are relatively unified.
- **Medium - Difficulty Questions (Type B)**: The feedback for medium - difficulty questions shows certain personalized differences, especially for students of different levels.
- **Difficult Questions (Type C)**: For difficult questions, the feedback differences among different student types are significant, and the degree of personalization is higher.
### Conclusion:
Preliminary research shows that the method of combining dynamic knowledge graphs and large - language models can, to a certain extent, provide personalized and adaptive student guidance and is helpful for improving students' learning effects. However, the research also points out the possible error and misguidance risks of large - language models and emphasizes the need for human intervention to reduce these risks. Future research will further optimize this method to enhance its application effect in the education field.