Clement E. Bohr,Marti Mestieri,Frederic Robert-Nicoud
Abstract:As countries develop, the relative importance of agriculture declines and economic activity becomes spatially concentrated. We develop a model integrating structural change and regional disparities to jointly capture these phenomena. A key modeling innovation ensuring analytical tractability is the introduction of non-homothetic Cobb-Douglas preferences, which are characterized by constant unitary elasticity of substitution and non-constant income elasticity. As labor productivity increases over time, economic well-being rises, leading to a declining expenditure share on agricultural goods. Labor reallocates away from agriculture, and industry concentrates spatially, further increasing aggregate productivity: structural change and regional disparities are two mutually reinforcing outcomes and propagators of the growth process.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the relationship between economic structural change and the spatial concentration of regional economic activities. Specifically, the authors hope to understand the following points:
1. **Interaction between structural change and spatial concentration**: As a country develops, the relative importance of agriculture declines, and economic activities become more spatially concentrated. Is this phenomenon unidirectionally driven (i.e., one causes the other), or are they co - determined and mutually reinforcing?
2. **How income growth affects economic structure and regional differences**: As labor productivity increases, per - capita income and economic well - being rise, leading to a shift in expenditure from agriculture to manufacturing. How does this shift trigger structural change and further lead to the spatial concentration of regional economic activities?
3. **Whether structural change and spatial concentration are the results of economic growth**: The authors attempt to prove that structural change and spatial concentration are the natural results of economic growth without relying on the reduction of transportation and trade costs.
### Main contributions of the paper
- **Introduction of a non - homogeneous demand system**: The authors introduce a new non - homogeneous Cobb - Douglas preference (Heterothetic Cobb - Douglas, hcd), which is characterized by an invariant unit substitution elasticity, but the income elasticity changes with the income level. This preference enables the model to better capture the changes in consumer behavior in the real economy.
- **Explanation of the formation mechanism of regional differences**: By combining new economic geography and structural change theory, the authors show how structural change promotes the formation of regional differences and is in turn strengthened by these differences. For example, as the share of manufacturing expenditure increases, the agglomeration effect is enhanced, leading to a high concentration of manufacturing activities in some regions.
- **Emphasis on the role of economic growth**: The paper points out that the increase in labor productivity and the status of manufacturing as a luxury are the main drivers of structural change and regional differences, rather than the reduction of transportation and trade costs in the traditional view.
### Model overview
To study these problems, the authors construct a static equilibrium model of two regions and two sectors (agriculture and manufacturing). In this model:
- **Agriculture**: It is related to land, and the output is freely traded between the two regions.
- **Manufacturing**: It has the characteristic of increasing internal returns to scale. Enterprises can freely choose to be established in either region, but their products need to pay transportation costs.
- **Labor and entrepreneurs**: Labor is geographically fixed but can work in different sectors; entrepreneurs can move between different regions to seek higher real returns.
Through this framework, the authors show that as labor productivity increases, the share of manufacturing expenditure increases, leading to the transfer of labor from agriculture to manufacturing, and further promoting the high concentration of manufacturing in some regions, forming regional differences.
### Conclusion
By introducing a non - homogeneous demand system, this paper provides a concise framework to analyze the two - way relationship between structural change and regional differences. The research shows that as the economy develops, structural change and spatial concentration are mutually reinforcing processes, and these phenomena are the natural results of economic growth without relying on the reduction of transportation and trade costs.