Abstract:In physics, you don't have to go around making trouble for yourself, – nature does it for you. All science is either physics or stamp collecting. Why is the concept of self-organized criticality (SOC), such an interdisciplinary subject, being applied in geophysics, astrophysics, or financial physics with equal fervor? On the most general level, the common denominator of all SOC processes in different science disciplines is the statistics of nonlinear processes, which exhibit omnipresent powerlaw distributions. Nonlinear processes are characterized by a nonlinear growth phase, during which coherent growth is enabled, which has multiplicative characteristics, in contrast to linear processes with incoherent and additive characteristics. Thus, incoherent random processes exhibit binomial, Gaussian, Poissonian, or exponential distribution functions, while coherent processes exhibit powerlaw-like distributions. This is the fundamental trait that earthquakes, solar flares, or stock market crashes have in common, although the underlying physics could not be more different. Therefore, it is important to understand that the powerlaw feature does not require any particular physical model: it can all be explained by mathematical theory in terms of statistical probabilities, as we discussed in Chapters 3 and 4. SOC behavior can thus also be simulated by mathematical rules, as we illustrated in terms of cellular automaton models in Chapter 2. Consequently, our treatment of SOC systems has been entirely physics-free so far, not requiring any particular physical model to understand the observed statistical distributions and correlations. However, there are some free parameters we used in our analytical SOC models (Chapter 3) that can only be explained in terms of a physical model for a particular phenomenon, such as the value α i of the powerlaw slope for each parameter distribution i, or the powerlaw indices β i j between various correlated parameters i and j. At this point, SOC models become specific because the physics of solar flares is different from the physics of tectonic plates. In the following we will focus on specific physical models of astrophysical SOC processes.

Testing the Universality of Self-Organized Criticality in Galactic, Extra-Galactic, and Black-Hole Systems

Universal Constants and Energy Integral in Self-Organized Criticality Systems

A Macroscopic Description of a Generalized Self-Organized Criticality System: Astrophysical Applications

The universality of power law slopes in the solar photosphere and transition region observed with HMI and IRIS

The State of Self-Organized Criticality of the Sun During the Last Three Solar Cycles. II. Theoretical Model

9. Physical Soc Models

Automated Solar Flare Statistics in Soft X-rays over 37 Years of GOES Observations - The Invariance of Self-Organized Criticality during Three Solar Cycles

Emergence of power-law distributions in self-segregation reaction-diffusion processes

Self-organized Criticality in Solar GeV Flares

Avalanches of Magnetic Flux Rope in the State of Self-Organized Criticality

Universal Quantification for Self-Organized Criticality in Atmospheric Flows

Scaling laws and indications of self-organized criticality in urban systems

Percolation Models of Self-Organized Critical Phenomena

Global Energetics of Solar Flares. XII. Energy Scaling Laws

Markov Chain Hidden behind Power Law Mechanism of Self-organized Criticality

Multi-Wavelength Observations of the Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Solar Flares with AIA/SDO: I. Universal Scaling Laws of Space and Time Parameters

Eigen microstates in self-organized criticality

Fractal Fluctuations and Statistical Normal Distribution

Eigenstates in the self-organised criticality

Galerkin Eigenvector Approximations

Testing growth rate dependence in cosmological perturbation theory using scale-free models