Abstract:Synthetic data generation with Large Language Models is a promising paradigm for augmenting natural data over a nearly infinite range of tasks. Given this variety, direct comparisons among synthetic data generation algorithms are scarce, making it difficult to understand where improvement comes from and what bottlenecks exist. We propose to evaluate algorithms via the makeup of synthetic data generated by each algorithm in terms of data quality, diversity, and complexity. We choose these three characteristics for their significance in open-ended processes and the impact each has on the capabilities of downstream models. We find quality to be essential for in-distribution model generalization, diversity to be essential for out-of-distribution generalization, and complexity to be beneficial for both. Further, we emphasize the existence of Quality-Diversity trade-offs in training data and the downstream effects on model performance. We then examine the effect of various components in the synthetic data pipeline on each data characteristic. This examination allows us to taxonomize and compare synthetic data generation algorithms through the components they utilize and the resulting effects on data QDC composition. This analysis extends into a discussion on the importance of balancing QDC in synthetic data for efficient reinforcement learning and self-improvement algorithms. Analogous to the QD trade-offs in training data, often there exist trade-offs between model output quality and output diversity which impact the composition of synthetic data. We observe that many models are currently evaluated and optimized only for output quality, thereby limiting output diversity and the potential for self-improvement. We argue that balancing these trade-offs is essential to the development of future self-improvement algorithms and highlight a number of works making progress in this direction.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the impact of synthetic data generation on the generalization ability of downstream models. Specifically, the author focuses on three key characteristics of synthetic data: Quality, diversity, and Complexity, and explores how these characteristics affect the model's generalization ability in - distribution and out - of - distribution (OOD). The main research questions of the paper include: 1. **How to define Quality, diversity, and Complexity?** How are these quantities measured in the large - language - model (LLM) literature? - Quality usually measures the "noise", "correctness" or "consistency" with the target distribution of data. - Diversity measures the "self - similarity" or "coverage" of data. - Complexity measures the "difficulty" or "composability" of data. 2. **How do Quality, diversity, and Complexity in the training data affect the model's generalization ability?** - The research finds that data quality is crucial for in - distribution generalization. - Data diversity is crucial for out - of - distribution generalization. - An appropriate level of data complexity can improve both in - distribution and out - of - distribution generalization ability. - There is often a trade - off between quality and diversity, and decisions need to be made among different mixtures of quality, diversity, and Complexity to optimize the generalization ability of downstream models. 3. **How do existing synthetic data generation algorithms promote Quality, diversity, and Complexity?** - The author analyzes these algorithms by classifying the common components in the synthetic data generation pipeline, dividing them into "Quality - promoting", "diversity - promoting", and "Complexity - promoting". - Most algorithms use relatively simple methods to improve quality, such as sampling from large SOTA models. Diversity is usually promoted by using a large seed data set to initialize sampling. Complexity is often not explicitly considered. - The paper discusses the impact of QDC data characteristics on the synthetic data generation process itself, especially in terms of model self - improvement. Similarly, there is also a trade - off between model output quality and diversity, and future algorithms need to carefully balance these trade - offs to achieve the best self - improvement. Through the exploration of these questions, the paper aims to provide guidance for designing more efficient and more generalized synthetic data generation algorithms.

Surveying the Effects of Quality, Diversity, and Complexity in Synthetic Data From Large Language Models

A Survey on Data Synthesis and Augmentation for Large Language Models

On the Diversity of Synthetic Data and its Impact on Training Large Language Models

Balancing Cost and Effectiveness of Synthetic Data Generation Strategies for LLMs

Quality Matters: Evaluating Synthetic Data for Tool-Using LLMs

Comprehensive Exploration of Synthetic Data Generation: A Survey

On LLMs-Driven Synthetic Data Generation, Curation, and Evaluation: A Survey

Best Practices and Lessons Learned on Synthetic Data

Unveiling the Flaws: Exploring Imperfections in Synthetic Data and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models

Evaluating Language Models as Synthetic Data Generators

Quality-Diversity Generative Sampling for Learning with Synthetic Data

Generating Faithful Synthetic Data with Large Language Models: A Case Study in Computational Social Science

Does Synthetic Data Make Large Language Models More Efficient?

Large Language Models as In-context AI Generators for Quality-Diversity

Synthetic Data Generation with Large Language Models for Text Classification: Potential and Limitations

Efficacy of Synthetic Data as a Benchmark

On the Equivalency, Substitutability, and Flexibility of Synthetic Data

The Curious Decline of Linguistic Diversity: Training Language Models on Synthetic Text

Generative AI for Synthetic Data Generation: Methods, Challenges and the Future

Generative Design through Quality-Diversity Data Synthesis and Language Models