Evolution of Collective AI Beyond Individual Optimization

Ryosuke Takata,Yujin Tang,Yingtao Tian,Norihiro Maruyama,Hiroki Kojima,Takashi Ikegami
2024-12-03
Abstract:This study investigates collective behaviors that emerge from a group of homogeneous individuals optimized for a specific capability. We created a group of simple, identical neural network based agents modeled after chemotaxis-driven vehicles that follow pheromone trails and examined multi-agent simulations using clones of these evolved individuals. Our results show that the evolution of individuals led to population differentiation. Surprisingly, we observed that collective fitness significantly changed during later evolutionary stages, despite maintained high individual performance and simplified neural architectures. This decline occurred when agents developed reduced sensor-motor coupling, suggesting that over-optimization of individual agents almost always lead to less effective group behavior. Our research investigates how individual differentiation can evolve through what evolutionary pathways.
Multiagent Systems,Artificial Intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Does individual optimization lead to the optimal performance of collective behavior, and how to achieve the emergence of collective intelligence through evolution?** Specifically, the research focuses on the collective behavior emerging from a group of homogeneous individuals with specific abilities. These individuals are optimized to perform specific tasks (such as chemotaxis), but they show different collective adaptability and behavior patterns in group interactions. The study found that although the individual performance remains at a high level, as the evolution progresses, the collective adaptability changes significantly, especially in the later stages, the collective adaptability actually decreases. This indicates that over - optimizing individuals almost always leads to a decrease in the effectiveness of group behavior. ### Research Background and Motivation 1. **Differences between Individual and Collective Intelligence**: - Individual intelligence usually deals with challenges independently, while collective intelligence needs to process information, operate in a decentralized manner, and adaptively integrate information according to the context. - Collective intelligence in biological systems (such as ants and bees) generates role differentiation and complex behaviors through interactions among simple individuals, rather than relying on highly complex individuals. 2. **Deficiencies in Existing Research**: - Existing AI research mostly focuses on individual intelligence, such as large - language models and image - generation models, etc., and pays less attention to collective intelligence. - The research on collective intelligence mainly focuses on biological systems and lacks in - depth exploration of collective intelligence in artificial systems. ### Research Objectives - Explore whether individual optimization leads to the optimal performance of collective behavior. - Study how agent individuals controlled by neural networks interact with each other in a shared environment to achieve the emergence of collective intelligence. - Analyze how group dynamics are separated from individual optimization to form unique collective behavior patterns. ### Methods and Experimental Design 1. **Model Construction**: - A neural - network - based agent model was constructed to simulate chemotaxis - driven vehicles following pheromone trails. - The CMA - ES algorithm was used for the evolutionary optimization of the neural network. 2. **Experimental Setup**: - The experiment was divided into two stages: the evolution stage of a single agent and the multi - agent testing stage. - In the testing stage, the best neural - network parameters evolved were copied to 1,024 agents for multi - agent simulation. 3. **Result Analysis**: - The behavior patterns of single agents and multi - agents were compared, and the changes in individual and collective behaviors in different generations were found. - The influence of environmental information and internal states on agent behavior was analyzed through statistical measures (such as mutual information, conditional entropy, etc.). ### Main Findings - **Relationship between Individual Optimization and Collective Behavior**: - The optimization of a single agent in the chemotaxis task does not necessarily lead to the optimization of collective behavior. In some cases, over - optimizing individuals actually reduces collective adaptability. - **Emergence of Collective Intelligence**: - Through pheromone - signal communication in the group, complex collective behavior patterns are formed among agents, including local aggregation and global diffusion, etc. - **Changes in Group Dynamics**: - Although the individual performance is stable, the group dynamics still keep changing, manifested as the diversification of collective adaptability. ### Conclusion This research shows that collective intelligence can emerge through differential interactions among initially homogeneous agent individuals without pre - designed heterogeneity. This finding supports the "community - first hypothesis", that is, homogeneous individuals themselves have potential heterogeneity, and the social structure provides the basis for the manifestation of this heterogeneity. The research also emphasizes the importance of achieving differences at multiple organizational levels, which has important guiding significance for the architecture design of future collective AI systems.