Model design choices impact biological insight: Unpacking the broad landscape of spatial-temporal model development decisions
Jessica S Yu,Neda Bagheri,Jessica S. Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011917
2024-03-09
PLoS Computational Biology
Abstract:Computational models enable scientists to understand observed dynamics, uncover rules underlying behaviors, predict experimental outcomes, and generate new hypotheses. There are countless modeling approaches that can be used to characterize biological systems, further multiplied when accounting for the variety of model design choices. Many studies focus on the impact of model parameters on model output and performance; fewer studies investigate the impact of model design choices on biological insight. Here we demonstrate why model design choices should be deliberate and intentional in context of the specific research system and question. In this study, we analyze agnostic and broadly applicable modeling choices at three levels—system, cell, and environment—within the same agent-based modeling framework to interrogate their impact on temporal, spatial, and single-cell emergent dynamics. We identify key considerations when making these modeling choices, including the (i) differences between qualitative vs. quantitative results driven by choices in system representation, (ii) impact of cell-to-cell variability choices on cell-level and temporal trends, and (iii) relationship between emergent outcomes and choices of nutrient dynamics in the environment. This generalizable investigation can help guide the choices made when developing biological models that aim to characterize spatial-temporal dynamics. Scientists often rely on computational models to identify the basic building blocks, and uncover interactions, underlying complex biological systems. These models have proven invaluable at enabling researchers to computationally test, refine, and generate new hypotheses that can then be experimentally validated. The impact of computational models is constrained by what we do not know about the biology and the limitations of our computer software and hardware. Scientists have to make choices about what to include or leave out in their models because of these limitations. In our study, we investigate the impact of select modeling choices on the outcomes of an agent-based model characterizing cell population dynamics. We focus this study on three types of modeling choices that are not often rigorously evaluated despite their prevalence across many different types of models: (1) system representation, (2) cell/agent variability, and (3) environment dynamics. We report how each of these modeling choices affects simulated emergent outcomes, specifically growth rate, symmetry, and cell cycle length. Our research emphasizes how crucial it is to carefully consider and communicate the impact of these choices when developing computational models.
biochemical research methods,mathematical & computational biology