Abstract:Computer vision technologies have been applied to an increasingly wide range of applications from autonomous car navigation, to medical image analysis, to precision agriculture. Despite many of these exciting innovations, recent studies reveal a number of risks in using existing computer vision systems, suggesting results of such systems may be unfair or untrustworthy. For example, major commercial facial analysis tools were shown to have substantial accuracy disparities for people of different gender or with different skin colors (Buolamwini and Gebru 2018). Visual semantic role labeling models were found to exhibit societal biases and stereotypes (Zhao et al. 2017) such as frequently associating certain activity labels with specific gender (e.g., associate “cooking” with woman). Even worse, seemly accurate image classifiers may in fact made the predictions by picking up spurious correlations between objects and irrelevant background information rather than identifying meaningful features of the objects (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016). Many of the risks embedded in modern computer vision systems can be attributed to the use of a training dataset that is biased. Indeed, the computer vision community has long recognized that many visual datasets present varying degrees of build-in bias due to factors such as photographic style of photographers and selection from dataset curators (Torralba, Efros, and others 2011). Using these biased datasets to train machine learning models for addressing different computer vision tasks naturally leads to the phenomenon of “bias in, bias out” and results in undesirable performance. Thus, to mitigate the fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns in computer vision, a crucial step is to start the entire pipeline with high-quality visual datasets that, at least, are authentic representations of the visual world. In other words, being able to detect potential biases hidden in the datasets prior to model development is a key step in guarding against unfair or untrustworthy outcomes in computer vision. While a few techniques have been developed to automatically detect dataset biases (Tramer et al. 2017), the nonstructured nature of visual data makes bias discovery in image datasets particularly challenging. This is because no human-comprehensive attributes can be directly leveraged

Flaws of ImageNet, Computer Vision's Favourite Dataset

Automated Classification of Model Errors on ImageNet

Discovering Biases in Image Datasets with the Crowd

Why Do Deep Neural Networks Still Not Recognize These Images?: A Qualitative Analysis on Failure Cases of ImageNet Classification

Are we done with ImageNet?

Automated Cleanup of the ImageNet Dataset by Model Consensus, Explainability and Confident Learning

Image Classification with Small Datasets: Overview and Benchmark

ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge

From ImageNet to Image Classification: Contextualizing Progress on Benchmarks

Seeing the Unseen: Errors and Bias in Visual Datasets

Statistical Challenges with Dataset Construction: Why You Will Never Have Enough Images

Can Biases in ImageNet Models Explain Generalization?

Is it enough to optimize CNN architectures on ImageNet?

Fine-Grained ImageNet Classification in the Wild

ImageNet-E: Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness via Attribute Editing

Spurious Features Everywhere -- Large-Scale Detection of Harmful Spurious Features in ImageNet

A Comprehensive Study of Image Classification Model Sensitivity to Foregrounds, Backgrounds, and Visual Attributes

Leveraging Human-Machine Interactions for Computer Vision Dataset Quality Enhancement

Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine vision

Investigating the Quality of DermaMNIST and Fitzpatrick17k Dermatological Image Datasets

Rethinking Natural Adversarial Examples for Classification Models