A Review of LLM-based Explanations in Recommender Systems

Alan Said
2024-11-29
Abstract:The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as LLaMA and ChatGPT, has opened new opportunities for enhancing recommender systems through improved explainability. This paper provides a systematic literature review focused on leveraging LLMs to generate explanations for recommendations -- a critical aspect for fostering transparency and user trust. We conducted a comprehensive search within the ACM Guide to Computing Literature, covering publications from the launch of ChatGPT (November 2022) to the present (November 2024). Our search yielded 232 articles, but after applying inclusion criteria, only six were identified as directly addressing the use of LLMs in explaining recommendations. This scarcity highlights that, despite the rise of LLMs, their application in explainable recommender systems is still in an early stage. We analyze these select studies to understand current methodologies, identify challenges, and suggest directions for future research. Our findings underscore the potential of LLMs improving explanations of recommender systems and encourage the development of more transparent and user-centric recommendation explanation solutions.
Information Retrieval,Human-Computer Interaction
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to use large - language models (LLMs) to improve the interpretability of recommendation systems, thereby enhancing transparency and user trust. Specifically, through a systematic literature review, the paper explores how to use LLMs to generate recommendation explanations, identifies the challenges in current research, and proposes directions for future research. The paper emphasizes that although the application of LLMs in recommendation systems is still in its early stages, they show great potential in improving the interpretability of recommendation systems. ### Main problems 1. **Improvement of interpretability**: How to use LLMs to generate more natural and understandable recommendation explanations to improve users' understanding and acceptance. 2. **Transparency and trust**: By providing detailed explanations, how to enhance users' trust in the recommendation system and reduce the negative impacts caused by opacity. 3. **Deficiencies of existing methods**: Traditional recommendation system explanation methods often lack flexibility and personalization. How to use LLMs to overcome these limitations? 4. **Directions for future research**: Identify the challenges in current research, such as the balance between the clarity and complexity of explanations and the problem of explanation generation in cross - domain recommendations, and propose future research directions. ### Specific research objectives - **Systematic literature review**: Through a systematic review of relevant literature from November 2022 to November 2024, identify studies that directly use LLMs to generate recommendation explanations. - **Method analysis**: Analyze the methods, data sets, and research questions used in these studies to understand the current research level. - **Challenges and opportunities**: Point out the main challenges in current research, such as the balance between the clarity and complexity of explanations and the problem of explanation generation in cross - domain recommendations. - **Future directions**: Suggest the focus of future research, including improving the quality and effectiveness of explanations, and developing more effective evaluation methods and data sets. ### Conclusion Through a systematic review, the paper shows the potential of LLMs in generating explanations for recommendation systems, especially in improving users' understanding and trust. However, it also points out the challenges in current research, such as the balance between the clarity and complexity of explanations and the problem of explanation generation in cross - domain recommendations. Future research needs to further optimize the explanations generated by LLMs to ensure that they are both detailed and clear, and at the same time, combine traditional explanation methods to provide a more comprehensive explanation scheme.