Abstract:Coding tasks have been valuable for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs), as they demand the comprehension of high-level instructions, complex reasoning, and the implementation of functional programs -- core capabilities for advancing Artificial General Intelligence. Despite the progress in Large Multimodal Models (LMMs), which extend LLMs with visual perception and understanding capabilities, there remains a notable lack of coding benchmarks that rigorously assess these models, particularly in tasks that emphasize visual reasoning. To address this gap, we introduce HumanEval-V, a novel and lightweight benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LMMs' visual understanding and reasoning capabilities through code generation. HumanEval-V includes 108 carefully crafted, entry-level Python coding tasks derived from platforms like CodeForces and Stack Overflow. Each task is adapted by modifying the context and algorithmic patterns of the original problems, with visual elements redrawn to ensure distinction from the source, preventing potential data leakage. LMMs are required to complete the code solution based on the provided visual context and a predefined Python function signature outlining the task requirements. Every task is equipped with meticulously handcrafted test cases to ensure a thorough and reliable evaluation of model-generated solutions. We evaluate 19 state-of-the-art LMMs using HumanEval-V, uncovering significant challenges. Proprietary models like GPT-4o achieve only 13% pass@1 and 36.4% pass@10, while open-weight models with 70B parameters score below 4% pass@1. Ablation studies further reveal the limitations of current LMMs in vision reasoning and coding capabilities. These results underscore key areas for future research to enhance LMMs' capabilities. We have open-sourced our code and benchmark at <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/HumanEval-V/HumanEval-V-Benchmark" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>.

ScratchEval: Are GPT-4o Smarter than My Child? Evaluating Large Multimodal Models with Visual Programming Challenges

HumanEval-V: Evaluating Visual Understanding and Reasoning Abilities of Large Multimodal Models Through Coding Tasks

MMCode: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Code Generation with Visually Rich Programming Problems

MindScratch: A Visual Programming Support Tool for Classroom Learning Based on Multimodal Generative AI

Benchmarking Generative Models on Computational Thinking Tests in Elementary Visual Programming

Towards Data-Driving Multi-View Evaluation Framework for Scratch

Show, Don't Tell: Evaluating Large Language Models Beyond Textual Understanding with ChildPlay

Program Synthesis Benchmark for Visual Programming in XLogoOnline Environment

Evaluating ChatGPT and GPT-4 for Visual Programming

Scratch Copilot Evaluation: Assessing AI-Assisted Creative Coding for Families

Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Solving Visual Graph and Tree Based Data Structure Problems using Large Multimodal Models

HumanEval Pro and MBPP Pro: Evaluating Large Language Models on Self-invoking Code Generation

Multimodal Self-Instruct: Synthetic Abstract Image and Visual Reasoning Instruction Using Language Model

Visual Scratchpads: Enabling Global Reasoning in Vision

Can Large Language Models Understand Symbolic Graphics Programs?

LLMs for Coding and Robotics Education

ChartMimic: Evaluating LMM's Cross-Modal Reasoning Capability via Chart-to-Code Generation

ChatScratch: An AI-Augmented System Toward Autonomous Visual Programming Learning for Children Aged 6-12

TurtleBench: A Visual Programming Benchmark in Turtle Geometry

Evaluating Large Vision-and-Language Models on Children's Mathematical Olympiads