Assessing Vulnerability in Smart Contracts: The Role of Code Complexity Metrics in Security Analysis

Masoud Jamshidiyan Tehrani,Sattar Hashemi
2024-11-26
Abstract:Codes with specific characteristics are more exposed to security vulnerabilities. Studies have revealed that codes that do not adhere to best practices are more challenging to verify and maintain, increasing the likelihood of unnoticed or unintentionally introduced vulnerabilities. Given the crucial role of smart contracts in blockchain systems, ensuring their security and conducting thorough vulnerability analysis is critical. This study investigates the use of code complexity metrics as indicators of vulnerable code in Solidity smart contracts. We highlight the significance of complexity metrics as valuable complementary features for vulnerability assessment and provide insights into the individual power of each metric. By analyzing 21 complexity metrics, we explored their interrelation, association with vulnerability, discriminative power, and mean values in vulnerable versus neutral codes. The results revealed some high correlations and potential redundancies among certain metrics, but weak correlations between each independent metric and vulnerability. Nevertheless, we found that all metrics can effectively discriminate between vulnerable and neutral codes, and most complexity metrics, except for three, exhibited higher values in vulnerable codes.
Cryptography and Security,Software Engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the security vulnerability issues in smart contracts, especially evaluating and identifying potential vulnerable points in Solidity smart contracts through code complexity metrics. Specifically, the paper aims to explore the following points: 1. **Relationship between complexity metrics and vulnerabilities**: Research the differences in different complexity metric indicators between vulnerable and non - vulnerable codes to determine which complexity metrics can most effectively distinguish these two types of codes. 2. **Possibility of predicting vulnerabilities**: Explore the feasibility of using complexity metrics to predict which contracts in the entire smart contract ecosystem may have vulnerabilities. 3. **Correlation and redundancy of complexity metrics**: Analyze the correlation between each complexity metric and identify potential redundancies or inconsistencies. 4. **Association between complexity metrics and the existence of vulnerabilities**: Determine whether specific complexity metrics are associated with the existence of vulnerabilities. ### Main contributions of the paper - **Research objectives**: - Determine whether there are significant differences in complexity metrics between vulnerable and non - vulnerable functions and find the most effective complexity metrics. - Explore whether complexity metrics can be used as indicators to identify the location of potential vulnerable code. - Provide insights into the independent role of each complexity metric in vulnerability assessment. - **Research questions**: - **RQ1**: Is there a correlation between complexity metrics? The purpose is to identify potential redundancies or inconsistencies between various complexity metrics. - **RQ2**: Is there an association between each complexity metric and the existence of vulnerabilities? The purpose is to determine whether certain complexity metrics are associated with the existence of vulnerabilities in a single contract. - **RQ3**: Are there differences in complexity metrics between vulnerable and non - vulnerable codes? The purpose is to investigate whether complexity metrics can effectively distinguish between vulnerable and non - vulnerable functions in the report. - **RQ4**: How do the complexity metrics of vulnerable code differ from those of non - vulnerable code? The purpose is to examine whether code complexity is associated with a higher probability of vulnerability occurrence, so as to allocate resources more effectively to ensure the security of smart contracts. ### Conclusion By analyzing 21 complexity metrics, the paper reveals some high correlations and potential redundancies, but finds that the association between each independent complexity metric and vulnerabilities is weak. However, all complexity metrics can effectively distinguish between vulnerable and non - vulnerable codes, and most complexity metrics (except three) show higher values in vulnerable codes. This indicates that complexity metrics can be a valuable supplementary feature in smart contract vulnerability assessment. ### Method The paper uses the static analysis tool Solmet to extract complexity metrics from Solidity code and evaluates the relationship between these metrics and vulnerabilities through statistical analysis methods. The experimental design includes dataset description, experimental setup, and result analysis, which answers the above research questions in detail. Through this research, the author hopes to emphasize the importance of complexity metrics in smart contract security assessment and provide a valuable reference for future vulnerability detection.