Homeopathic Modernization and the Middle Science Trap: conceptual context of ergonomics, econometrics and logic of some national scientific case

Eldar Knar

2024-11-25

Abstract:This article analyses the structural and institutional barriers hindering the development of scientific systems in transition economies, such as Kazakhstan. The main focus is on the concept of the "middle science trap," which is characterized by steady growth in quantitative indicators (publications, grants) but a lack of qualitative advancement. Excessive bureaucracy, weak integration into the international scientific community, and ineffective science management are key factors limiting development. This paper proposes an approach of "homeopathic modernization," which focuses on minimal yet strategically significant changes aimed at reducing bureaucratic barriers and enhancing the effectiveness of the scientific ecosystem. A comparative analysis of international experience (China, India, and the European Union) is provided, demonstrating how targeted reforms in the scientific sector can lead to significant results. Social and cultural aspects, including the influence of mentality and institutional structure, are also examined, and practical recommendations for reforming the scientific system in Kazakhstan and Central Asia are offered. The conclusions of the article could be useful for developing national science modernization programs, particularly in countries with high levels of bureaucracy and conservatism.

Econometrics,Digital Libraries,Physics and Society

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the structural and institutional obstacles encountered in the process of scientific development in transition economies (such as Kazakhstan). Specifically, the article focuses on the concept of "middle science trap", that is, although these countries have a steady growth in the number of scientific publications and scientific research funding, they lack progress in qualitative improvement. The main problems include:

1. **Excessive bureaucracy**: Scientific research is affected by too much administrative intervention and cumbersome procedures.
2. **Weak connection with the international scientific community**: It is difficult to integrate into the global scientific research network, resulting in poor information and technology exchange.
3. **Ineffective scientific research management**: Irrational resource allocation, lack of transparency and efficiency.

In order to solve these problems, the author proposes the concept of "homeopathic modernization", advocating small but refined strategic reforms to reduce bureaucratic barriers and enhance the effectiveness of the scientific ecosystem. This strategy aims to achieve the following goals:

- **Gradual change**: Implement small but strategically significant changes to avoid strong resistance within the system.
- **Improve efficiency**: Significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of scientific research management by optimizing key links within the existing system (such as digitalization, improving the review system, and optimizing funding allocation).
- **Learn from international experience**: Refer to the successful cases of China, India and the EU to show how to achieve remarkable results through targeted reforms.

In addition, the article also explores sociocultural factors (such as the influence of mentality and institutional structure), and provides specific policy recommendations to promote the reform of the scientific system in Kazakhstan and Central Asia. Finally, the article emphasizes that only through reasonable management and gradual reform can Kazakhstan's science break free from the "middle science trap" and move towards a high - quality and progressive development path.

### Key formula
The article does not involve complex mathematical or physical formulas, but for the sake of understanding, the following is a simplified expression of the "middle science trap":

\[
\text{Middle science trap} = \left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
\text{Growth of quantitative indicators} & \text{(such as an increase in the number of papers)} \\
\text{Stagnation of qualitative indicators} & \text{(such as insufficient innovation ability and international competitiveness)}
\end{array}
\right.
\]

This expression illustrates that although there is progress in quantity, no breakthrough has been made in quality, thus falling into a development bottleneck.