Abstract:The aim of Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) is to infer a reward function $R$ from a policy $\pi$. This problem is difficult, for several reasons. First of all, there are typically multiple reward functions which are compatible with a given policy; this means that the reward function is only *partially identifiable*, and that IRL contains a certain fundamental degree of ambiguity. Secondly, in order to infer $R$ from $\pi$, an IRL algorithm must have a *behavioural model* of how $\pi$ relates to $R$. However, the true relationship between human preferences and human behaviour is very complex, and practically impossible to fully capture with a simple model. This means that the behavioural model in practice will be *misspecified*, which raises the worry that it might lead to unsound inferences if applied to real-world data. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive mathematical analysis of partial identifiability and misspecification in IRL. Specifically, we fully characterise and quantify the ambiguity of the reward function for all of the behavioural models that are most common in the current IRL literature. We also provide necessary and sufficient conditions that describe precisely how the observed demonstrator policy may differ from each of the standard behavioural models before that model leads to faulty inferences about the reward function $R$. In addition to this, we introduce a cohesive framework for reasoning about partial identifiability and misspecification in IRL, together with several formal tools that can be used to easily derive the partial identifiability and misspecification robustness of new IRL models, or analyse other kinds of reward learning algorithms.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?
The paper "Partial Identifiability and Misspecification in Inverse Reinforcement Learning" mainly focuses on solving two core challenges in inverse reinforcement learning (IRL): **partial identifiability** and **model misspecification**.
#### 1. Partial Identifiability
In IRL, inferring the reward function R from a given policy π is a difficult problem. One of the main reasons is that there are usually multiple reward functions that are compatible with the given policy π. This means that the reward function is **partially identifiable**, that is, it cannot be uniquely determined, resulting in an inherent ambiguity in the IRL problem. Specifically:
- **Multiple solutions**: For the same policy π, there may be multiple different reward functions R that can all produce the same optimal policy.
- **Indistinguishability**: Since these reward functions produce the same policy, it is impossible to distinguish these different reward functions just by observing the policy.
To address this challenge, the authors provide a comprehensive mathematical analysis of the ambiguity of the reward function and quantify this ambiguity. They also precisely describe the degree of ambiguity of the reward function for common behavioral models.
#### 2. Model Misspecification
Another key issue is that IRL algorithms require a behavioral model to describe the relationship between the policy π and the reward function R. However, the relationship between human preferences and behavior in the real world is very complex and it is almost impossible to fully capture it with a simple model. This leads to the fact that the behavioral models actually used are usually **misspecified**, that is, the model cannot accurately describe the real relationship. Specifically:
- **Complexity**: The complexity of human behavior and preferences makes it difficult for simple behavioral models to model completely accurately.
- **Deviation from reality**: There are significant differences between real - world data and data synthesized based on standard assumptions, indicating that there is misspecification in the behavioral model.
To solve this problem, the authors analyze the impact of different forms of misspecification on IRL and give the necessary and sufficient conditions to describe the types of misspecification that each behavioral model can tolerate. In addition, they also study some specific types of misspecification, such as misspecification of behavioral model parameters or perturbation of the observed policy.
#### Main contributions of the paper
1. **Theoretical framework**: Introduced a unified theoretical framework for analyzing partial identifiability and model misspecification robustness in IRL.
2. **Ambiguity quantification**: Comprehensively characterized and quantified the ambiguity of the reward function under common behavioral models.
3. **Misspecification analysis**: Provided the necessary and sufficient conditions to describe the types of misspecification that various behavioral models can tolerate.
4. **Application tools**: Developed a series of formal tools that can easily derive the partial identifiability and model misspecification robustness of new IRL models.
In summary, this paper aims to provide a systematic theoretical understanding to help us evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of IRL methods in inferring human preferences and intentions.