Abstract:Trade imbalances significantly alter the welfare implications of tariffs. Using an illustrative model, we show that trade deficits enhance a country's ability to alter its terms of trade, and thereby benefit from tariffs. Greater trade deficits imply higher optimal, or welfare maximizing, tariffs. We compute optimal unilateral and Nash equilibrium tariffs between the United States and China $\unicode{x2014}$ the countries with the largest bilateral trade imbalance $\unicode{x2014}$ using a multi-region, multi-sector applied general equilibrium model with service sectors and input-output linkages, a computationally complex task. We find the United States gains from such a trade war with China, albeit minimally.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to explore the impact of trade imbalances on the welfare effects of trade policies, especially at the theoretical and quantitative analysis levels. Specifically, the author re - examines Johnson (1953)'s classic results on optimal tariff policies and extends them to situations where there are trade deficits. The study finds that trade deficits make foreign demand more inelastic, thereby allowing the home country to better manipulate the terms of trade, which leads to a higher optimal tariff rate, that is, the tariff rate that can maximize welfare. Through numerical simulations, the author shows that this conclusion holds true both when bilateral trade imbalances lead to overall trade imbalances and when only bilateral trade imbalances exist.
The paper also calculates the optimal unilateral and Nash equilibrium tariffs between China and the United States through a multi - regional, multi - sector applied general equilibrium model, taking into account the service sector and input - output linkages. The study finds that the United States has obtained welfare gains in the trade war with China, although these gains are small. This result is mainly driven by the large - scale bilateral trade deficit of the United States with China and the relatively high baseline tariffs of China on imported goods from the United States, both of which reduce the potential losses of retaliation. However, compared with the free - trade baseline, the United States has experienced a slight welfare loss. When the service sector and input - output linkages are included in the model, this conclusion is more obvious. This emphasizes the importance of conducting trade policy analysis in a fully specified framework.
In addition, the paper also evaluates the welfare impacts of trade wars with other trading partners and finds that in some cases, the United States benefits from initiating trade wars. These results may help to explain the increasingly confrontational attitude of deficit countries in international trade disputes.