Abstract:Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have shown promise in enhancing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, these systems face challenges in effectively integrating external knowledge with the LLM's internal knowledge, often leading to issues with misleading or unhelpful information. This work aims to provide a systematic study on knowledge checking in RAG systems. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of LLM representation behaviors and demonstrate the significance of using representations in knowledge checking. Motivated by the findings, we further develop representation-based classifiers for knowledge filtering. We show substantial improvements in RAG performance, even when dealing with noisy knowledge databases. Our study provides new insights into leveraging LLM representations for enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of RAG systems.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to effectively conduct knowledge checking in Retrieval - Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Specifically, RAG systems face challenges when combining external knowledge sources with the internal knowledge of large - language models (LLMs), and these challenges may lead to the generation of misleading or useless information. The paper aims to improve the performance of RAG systems through a systematic study of representation - based knowledge - checking methods, especially when the external knowledge base is noisy. The authors propose tasks such as internal knowledge checking, usefulness checking, and contradiction checking, and filter knowledge through a representation classifier to enhance the reliability and effectiveness of RAG systems. ### Main Research Questions: 1. **Internal Knowledge Checking**: When a user enters a query, the LLM should first check whether it has internal knowledge related to the query. 2. **Usefulness Checking**: - **Known Usefulness Checking**: When the LLM has internal knowledge, check whether the external knowledge is helpful in answering the query. - **Unknown Usefulness Checking**: When the LLM lacks internal knowledge, check whether the external knowledge is helpful in answering the query. 3. **Contradiction Checking**: Check whether there are contradictions between the internal knowledge and the retrieved external information. ### Solutions: - **Representation - Checking Methods**: The paper proposes using two methods, principal component analysis (PCA) and contrastive learning, to check the effectiveness of knowledge. - **PCA - Based Checking**: Calculate the difference vectors of positive and negative sample pairs, apply PCA to extract the main components, and then use a logistic regression model for classification. - **Contrastive - Learning - Based Checking**: Design a contrastive network, train the model by maximizing the similarity of positive sample pairs and minimizing the similarity of negative sample pairs, so as to distinguish different types of samples. ### Experimental Results: - **Internal Knowledge Checking**: Representation - based methods (such as rep - PCA and rep - Con) are significantly better than traditional answer - and probability - based methods, achieving accuracies of 75% and 79% respectively. - **Unknown Usefulness Checking**: Representation - based methods also perform well in unknown usefulness checking, with rep - PCA and rep - Con achieving accuracies of 79% and 81% respectively. - **Known Usefulness Checking**: In known usefulness checking, representation - based methods also perform excellently, with rep - PCA and rep - Con achieving accuracies of 81% and 85% respectively. - **Contradiction Checking**: In detecting contradictions between external information and internal knowledge, representation - based methods are particularly outstanding, with rep - PCA and rep - Con achieving accuracies of 91% and 95% respectively. ### Conclusion: Through representation - based methods, the paper has successfully improved the performance of RAG systems in dealing with noisy knowledge bases, especially in aspects such as internal knowledge checking, usefulness checking, and contradiction checking. These methods provide new insights for improving the reliability and effectiveness of RAG systems.

Towards Knowledge Checking in Retrieval-augmented Generation: A Representation Perspective

Retrieving, Rethinking and Revising: The Chain-of-Verification Can Improve Retrieval Augmented Generation

WeKnow-RAG: An Adaptive Approach for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Integrating Web Search and Knowledge Graphs

Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey

LLMs Know What They Need: Leveraging a Missing Information Guided Framework to Empower Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Astute RAG: Overcoming Imperfect Retrieval Augmentation and Knowledge Conflicts for Large Language Models

Enhancing LLM Factual Accuracy with RAG to Counter Hallucinations: A Case Study on Domain-Specific Queries in Private Knowledge-Bases

RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Natural Language Processing: A Survey

CommunityKG-RAG: Leveraging Community Structures in Knowledge Graphs for Advanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Fact-Checking

Mindful-RAG: A Study of Points of Failure in Retrieval Augmented Generation

A Systematic Investigation of Knowledge Retrieval and Selection for Retrieval Augmented Generation

Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation

Towards Understanding Retrieval Accuracy and Prompt Quality in RAG Systems

DomainRAG: A Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Domain-specific Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Do You Know What You Are Talking About? Characterizing Query-Knowledge Relevance For Reliable Retrieval Augmented Generation

Simple is Effective: The Roles of Graphs and Large Language Models in Knowledge-Graph-Based Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey

Speculative RAG: Enhancing Retrieval Augmented Generation through Drafting

RuleRAG: Rule-guided retrieval-augmented generation with language models for question answering