Abstract:We study the inference of network archaeology in growing random geometric graphs. We consider the root finding problem for a random nearest neighbor tree in dimension $d \in \mathbb{N}$, generated by sequentially embedding vertices uniformly at random in the $d$-dimensional torus and connecting each new vertex to the nearest existing vertex. More precisely, given an error parameter $\varepsilon > 0$ and the unlabeled tree, we want to efficiently find a small set of candidate vertices, such that the root is included in this set with probability at least $1 - \varepsilon$. We call such a candidate set a $\textit{confidence set}$. We define several variations of the root finding problem in geometric settings -- embedded, metric, and graph root finding -- which differ based on the nature of the type of metric information provided in addition to the graph structure (torus embedding, edge lengths, or no additional information, respectively). We show that there exist efficient root finding algorithms for embedded and metric root finding. For embedded root finding, we derive upper and lower bounds (uniformly bounded in $n$) on the size of the confidence set: the upper bound is subpolynomial in $1/\varepsilon$ and stems from an explicit efficient algorithm, and the information-theoretic lower bound is polylogarithmic in $1/\varepsilon$. In particular, in $d=1$, we obtain matching upper and lower bounds for a confidence set of size $\Theta\left(\frac{\log(1/\varepsilon)}{\log \log(1/\varepsilon)} \right)$.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to solve a specific problem in network archaeology, that is, to infer the origin (root node) of a network in a geometric environment. Specifically, it studies how to find the root node in a random nearest - neighbor tree. The model generates a tree by embedding vertices in a $d$-dimensional torus in chronological order and connecting each new vertex to the nearest existing vertex. #### Main problem description Given an error parameter $\varepsilon > 0$ and an unlabeled tree structure, the goal is to efficiently find a small set of candidate vertices $H(\varepsilon, n)$ such that the root node is included in this set with a probability of at least $1-\varepsilon$. Such a candidate set is called a confidence set. #### Research background and motivation In the study of network archaeology, people are concerned with how to use the current structure of a network to infer its historical process. For example, whether it is possible to determine which vertex was added first, which vertices were added early, and which vertices were added late through the network structure. This research explores the problem of network archaeology in a geometric environment, especially how to use geometric information to improve the efficiency of finding the root node. #### Specific problem variants The paper defines three different types of root - node - finding problems: - **Embedded root - node - finding**: The algorithm can access an unlabeled tree embedded in a $d$-dimensional torus. - **Metric root - node - finding**: The algorithm can access the adjacency matrix of an unlabeled tree and its corresponding edge lengths. - **Graph - theoretic root - node - finding**: The algorithm can only access the adjacency matrix of an unlabeled tree. #### Research methods and results The paper shows that for the embedded and metric root - node - finding problems, there are efficient algorithms. In particular, in the one - dimensional case, the paper gives matching upper and lower bounds: \[ |H(\varepsilon, n)| \approx \frac{\log(1/\varepsilon)}{\log\log(1/\varepsilon)} \] Furthermore, for higher - dimensional cases, although the bounds in the one - dimensional case cannot be maintained, a sub - polynomial confidence set of size $1/\varepsilon$ can still be returned. #### Challenges and proof ideas The root - node - finding algorithm in a geometric environment can access more information (such as edge lengths and geometric embeddings), which makes the problem seem easier. However, because the geometric attachment process is very different from the combinatorial process, the analysis also brings new challenges. The paper overcomes these challenges by the following methods: - Utilizing the characteristics of long edges, because long edges are more likely to appear in the early stage. - Pruning the graph to form a sub - graph with a bounded degree, thereby excluding "covering" vertices that cannot be root nodes. In summary, what this paper attempts to solve is how to find the root node of a random nearest - neighbor tree efficiently and accurately in a geometric environment, and it provides theoretical upper and lower bounds as well as specific algorithm implementations.

Finding the root in random nearest neighbor trees

New results for the random nearest neighbor tree

Optimal root recovery for uniform attachment trees and $d$-regular growing trees

Faster Algorithms for Rooted Connectivity in Directed Graphs

Packing and finding paths in sparse random graphs

Testing Thresholds for High-Dimensional Sparse Random Geometric Graphs

Planting trees in graphs, and finding them back

Siblings in d-dimensional nearest neighbour trees

A note on estimating the dimension from a random geometric graph

Sandwiching Random Geometric Graphs and Erdos-Renyi with Applications: Sharp Thresholds, Robust Testing, and Enumeration

Large deviations of empirical neighborhood distribution in sparse random graphs

Determining Geodesic Distance on Arbitrary-order Subdivision of Tree with Applications

Testing for High-Dimensional Geometry in Random Graphs

Faster algorithms for the alignment of sparse correlated Erdős–Rényi random graphs

A New Approach for Approximating Directed Rooted Networks

Faster algorithms for the alignment of sparse correlated Erdös-Rényi random graphs

Growing random graphs with a preferential attachment structure

Random friend trees

Persistence of centrality in random growing trees

Quenched worst-case scenario for root deletion in targeted cutting of random recursive trees

Finding local community structure in networks